Search for: "IN RE: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
Entertainment, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
Mohammed et al. and brought us almost-live coverage of the subsequent motions hearing. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 11:01 pm
Mr MacShane said: “Any order that bans the press from reporting the facts, and then bans the reporting of the ban itself, is Kafkaesque. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Consider these data points.[13] In the 2009 calendar year, C-SPAN provided the following amount of first run programming across their three channels: 8,438 overall hours of programming; 2,709 hours of House & Senate floor activity; and, 1,222 hours of House & Senate committee hearings. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm
The Press Gazette has more information here. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Toffoloni Docket: 09-625 Issue: Whether First Amendment freedom of the [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
Editorial director of From Chains to Bonds, (UNESCO, 1998), he wrote the preface to Tradition orale et archives de la traite négrière (UNESCO, 2001), as well as the editorial of Newsletter No. 2 of ‘The Slave Route’ (UNESCO, 2001). [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Res. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm
Few if any nations and international treaties interpret "the freedom of speech, or of the press," or "the free exercise" of religion as strongly as do American courts. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
The Committee to Protect Journalists joined 25 other press freedom organizations today in sending a joint letter to the European Commission calling for reforms to European Union law on defamation. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
AL., FEDERAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE: EVIDENCE §5501 (1st ed.) [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
& Leila Barraza et al., Supreme Court Impacts in Public Health Law: 2022-2023, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (forthcoming 2023) In another tumultuous term of the United States Supreme Court in 2022-2023 a series of cr [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:05 pm
In their newly published review paper[4], O’Bryan et al. explain that, although the current USDA qualitative performance standards have lowered the prevalence of Salmonella found on raw poultry products, progress has stalled on lowering the cases of salmonellosis associated with poultry. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
He was the only witness to take this view and his evidence was rejected by the Committee finding that “there is no doubt that counterfeiting and piracy cause economic harm to intellectual property owners, private companies and Canadian governments. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Center for American Progress report a mixed bag of recommendations to Obama Administration (Patent Docs) Manufacturing letter on patent reform to President Obama (Anticipate This!) [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
[Note: this sounds like the kind of thing that should also be protected by the First Amendment’s press freedom, but none of the 4 opinions analyzed the First Amendment.] [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
Karen Bradshaw & Jessica Owley et al., The Tyranny of Baselines, 54 Environmental Law Reporter 10219 (2024) Many environmental law paradigms focus on fixed points. [read post]
