Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULE 6-9(b)(5) OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS"
Results 21 - 40
of 339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
Whether the group members and the defenders are bound by agreements which are governed by Kenyan law and under which, properly construed under Kenyan law, the exclusive jurisdiction of the Kenyan courts in respect of the disputes articulated in these proceedings is prorogated; b. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
EPA.[46] As the Supreme Court observed, “[e]xtraordinary grants of regulatory authority are rarely accomplished through ‘modest words,’ ‘vague terms,’ or ‘subtle device[s]’” and that Congress does not “typically use oblique or elliptical language to empower an agency to make a ‘radical or fundamental change’ to a statutory sche [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Many other courts have done much the same, both in state[18] and in federal courts,[19] and both before and after the Supreme Court decided Daubert, and even after Rule 702 was amended in 2000.[20] Perhaps even more disturbing is that the current edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence glibly cites to the Wells case, for the dubious proposition that “Generally, researchers are conservative when it comes to assessing causal… [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
You’re making me tired just thinking about it! [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
Supreme Court.[6] One influential re-articulation came in Wisconsin v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
But it has been the invigoration of a more muscular federalism, with what appears to be a willingness by the US Supreme Court to re-imagine the division of authority between states and the national government, that is now providing substantial impetus for a vigorous debate about ESG beyond the conversations traditionally driven by elites in apex public and private institutions. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
We continue to monitor the emergence of a potential circuit split regarding whether the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Lorenzo allows scheme liability under Rule 10b-5(a) and (c) without alleging dissemination and based solely on the same conduct as Rule 10b-5(b) misrepresentation claims. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
B. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
In a sense, the Seife decision brings back some flavor of the old National Parks test rejected by the Supreme Court in Argus Leader. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:57 am
The modern bankruptcy judge confirmed that rule of law in the In Re Stepp ruling 22-41617. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
The Siracusa Principles do not enjoy the status of rules of law in HKSAR. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
P. 26(b)(3)(A); Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules—1970 Amendment; 8 FED. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
The United States Court of Appeals explained its understanding of complexity that should remove a case from the province of the seventh amendment: “A suit is too complex for a jury when circumstances render the jury unable to decide in a proper manner. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
by Dennis Crouch It is time to pick-up our consideration of Supreme Court patent cases for the 2022-2023 term. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Part I: American Interpretive Pluralism First, consider the use of legal canons, which leads to interpretive pluralism in American statutory interpretation, even on a majority textualist Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Though Novak was trained as a historian, he is currently a law professor, and, like so many of the members of this guild, is committed to making normative claims that might gain traction in the courts. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Omnicare,[7] so long as they are genuinely held and not misleading when considered in their full context. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
A review of tragic case of Re AB in which the Court of Appeal overturned the decision of the Court of Protection to permit an NHS Trust to perform an abortion on. a 24-year-old woman. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
Moving beyond the (shameful) leak at the Supreme Court to the substance of the leaked draft opinion, it seems safe to assume that some on the Supreme Court already have or will soon dust off the following speech from the D.C. [read post]
