Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULE 7 OF RULES GOVERNING ADMISSION TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW" Results 21 - 40 of 175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am by Jacob Fishman
In Students for Fair Admissions, a non-employment case, a six-member majority ruled that the use of race in the admissions policies of the two defendants (Harvard and the University of North Carolina) violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am by Steven M. Taber
  This Newsletter also appears as a post on our website on our blog, The Environmental Law and Climate Change Law Blog. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
Is it desirable, as a matter of public policy governing the practice of law, to remove barratry claims, legal malpractice claims and other claims of wrongful conduct brought against attorneys from the court system and divert them into private arbitration? [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm by Stephen Wm. Smith
These admissions might well have affected the outcome of the case, possibly resulting in a remand for reconsideration by the First Circuit. [read post]
As we have seen time and again across our Governmental Practice teams, companies can help avoid costly penalties, litigation, and legal fees in the face of a government inquiry or investigation by acting early to make informed and honest disclosures, and creating tailored policies and procedures that are diligently followed. 2. [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
They have pointed to laws that allow the Chinese government to secretly demand data from Chinese companies and citizens for intelligence-gathering operations. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Depending on the specific foundation, such a ruling could be useful in attacking affirmative action in other areas, including employment and government contracting. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:19 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
Instead, this paper will focus on practical legal problems which we have recently encountered in cases. 2. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
” The denial continues the Court’s general pattern of passing on Second Amendment challenges to gun control laws since the Court decided McDonald v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:41 pm by thehealthlawfirm
He is the President and Managing Partner of The Health Law Firm, which has a national practice. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm by John Steele
In In re Mance, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled that flat fees are not earned upon receipt. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
One argument that often comes up in such cases is that many Sikhs wear short and blunt knives as their kirpans, taking the view that the kirpan is supposed to be a symbolic weapon, not a usable one; it’s possible that exempting such knives — even if they technically violate the law or a government agency rule — wouldn’t really undermine the interest in fighting crime. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 9:39 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Admittedly, Belgian law provides that a Belgian patent ceases to have effect once a European patent covering the same invention has been granted to the same inventor, but this provision does not govern the relationship between two European patents. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Procedural history The Clients sued appellees, asserting the following claims and requesting the following remedies in their fifth amended petition: (1) barratry and fee forfeiture, (2) breach of fiduciary duty, (3) fraud by nondisclosure, omission, or concealment, (4) rescission, (5) unjust enrichment, (6) legal malpractice, (7) conspiracy, (8) violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, (9) suspension from the practice of law and… [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:26 am by Michael Lowe
Ed. 944 (1928), SCOTUS ruled that wiretapping was not protected by the privacy provisions of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]