Search for: "IN RE COMCAST"
Results 21 - 40
of 829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2008, 7:57 pm
Speaking as a Comcast phone, Internet and cable subscriber, here's what you're in for: Endless waits on hold, only to have Comcast hang up on you. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:15 am
AT&T and Comcast objected to these subpoenas. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:21 pm
I had not, until I read In re IKO Roofing Shingle Products Liability Litigation, No. 14-1532, 2014 U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 6:00 pm
In so doing, the Court refused to take notice of swap agreements between AT&T and Adelphia which Comcast argued demonstrated that the swap agreement did not impose restrictions on the ability of any counter-party to re-enter or compete directly in the affected markets.Comcast also argued that allegations of per se illegality were improper given that the transactions at issue were approved by government authorities at the federal, state and local levels. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 10:08 am
We see concerning things happening if you look at cable companies like Comcast now instituting data caps that just happen to be at a level at or below what someone would use if they’re watching TV on the Internet—and at the same time launching their own streaming service that they say doesn’t count against the data cap. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 7:06 am
They won’t even admit what they’re doing, let alone offer a rationale for it, so we’re left to speculate. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:07 am
Comcast Corp. that certification was wholly consistent with its instructions to district courts in the seminal case of In re Hydrogen Peroxide, 552 F.3d 305 (3d Cir. 2008), which outlines the standards a district court should apply in determining whether to certify a class. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:47 pm
Now we’re in the end-game - so let’s pull some threads together for this last post for the year. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 12:12 pm
Also: FCC Orders Comcast to Stop Blocking Some Large Files (pdf) [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 5:16 am
RE: Formal Complaint of Free Press and Public Knowledge Against Comcast Corporation for Secretly Degrading Peer-to-Peer Applications; Broadband Industry Practices,... [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 4:04 pm
Here is a pdf copy of the trial court’s opinion: Judge Baldwin Order & Opinion re amended class cert order. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 1:14 pm
" In re: Formal Complaint of Free Press and Public Knowledge Against Comcast Corporation for Secretly Degrading Peer-to-Peer Application No. 08-183. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 3:36 pm
In re Urethane Antitrust Litigation, No. 04-1616 (D. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 2:28 pm
Congressmembers know many things, but they’re not exactly the first group you would turn to for information about how network protocols work. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:13 pm
Feb. 10, 2015), the Second Circuit gave a narrow reading of the Court's ruling on class certification in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 4:52 pm
see, you’re getting used to this) would give them the power to suppress online competition. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 8:18 am
Presumably they're following this dispute more closely than I am, and understand the business issues better than I do, so if they're not concerned that suggests maybe I shouldn't be either. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 10:48 am
When asked how the error occurred, Comcast said, "we’re looking into that." [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:57 pm
RBS Citizens, NA, 667 F.3d 900 (7th Cir. 2012) (see my blog post about Ross) and In re Whirlpool Corp. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:09 pm
Comcast Corp., 655 F.3d 182 (3d Cir. 2011). [read post]
