Search for: "IN RE THE ADOPTION OF C W D"
Results 21 - 40
of 516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2015, 12:50 pm
DCt interprets claim term “inejctor” to be limited to injector w/pressure jacket; CAFC reverses b/c there’s no ambiguity. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
[Though see KP Permanent/Sealed w/a Kiss case—that’s a risk the D took when it adopted a descriptive mark.]Beebe: Seabrooktest is a “distinctiveness from others” test that ultimately is used to answer “distinctive to consumers” question.Jeanne Fromer: We conflate inherent/acquired distinctiveness in many circumstances, but the concepts are distinct. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
§ 1052(c) provides, in pertinent part, that the PTO must deny federal registration to a trademark if it “[c]onsists of or comprises a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular individual except by his written consent…. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am
Said: whose perspective are we adopting when talking about consumer/subject interests? [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 10:14 am
W. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 2:29 am
W. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
Additionally, insurers should anticipate the potential for coverage of future settlements of D&O cases involving cybersecurity issues in light of more rigorous regulatory standards that companies are expected to adopt. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
Additionally, insurers should anticipate the potential for coverage of future settlements of D&O cases involving cybersecurity issues in light of more rigorous regulatory standards that companies are expected to adopt. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:23 pm
Re B concerned decisions under the CA 1989 and the Adoption and Children Act 2002 making public law orders relating to children which plainly engaged the right to family life protection enshrined in ECHR, Article 8. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:02 pm
Instructions are low-hanging fruit b/c they’re so bad right now. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:25 am
Jane Ginsburg’s argument: no need to define separability b/c this is just a question of applying a 2D design to an object.Samuelson: thinks they’re going to reverse; they were caught up with the camo metaphor. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm
They do their own screening of IP rights, and are generally cautious b/c they’re academic institutions. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
In re Rafael C., supra. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:30 pm
We’d like to see industry adopt something like BookID on a wide basis, including ISPs. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
Grenig, & W. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:04 am
W/o proof that there’d been panhandling in garages, couldn’t ban panhandling in garages. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
W. [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:05 am
My Law Office is located at 726 West Saint Georges [W. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
Over the 20th c., some significant trends. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am
A: I want you to be able to reply to a C&D with “no, b/c X. [read post]
