Search for: "IN RE TRUMAN MINORS"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 2:23 pm
(Or the bullshit, depending on how you want to discuss it - Truman Capote famously said of Jack Kerouac's books, "That's not writing, it's typing. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:43 pm
Mead writes with obvious admiration that Harry S Truman read it five times during his presidency, cover to cover. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 11:15 am
They're boring! [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am
It is also virtually impossible to defend today, was put into the Constitution by Framers who didn’t trust the People to elect the president, and yet we’re still stuck with it. (3) Perhaps more important than the Constitution’s containing some indefensible provisions is the fact that it’s largely irrelevant to current political arrangements: We’ve ignored the document, and the Supreme Court, its supposed guardian, has largely acquiesced in that arrangement (and… [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 4:03 pm
I try to imagine what FDR or Harry Truman would do in similar situations, and it sure as hell isn't rolling over and playing dead. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:48 am
What if the desire to “Kill Jews” was re-tweeted to someone who took Rachel seriously and actually committed a murder? [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
Does it not feel a bit like "The Truman Show" already? [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 1:07 pm
Now we're talking glass ceilings. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
February 5, 2007Re: The Preternaturally Prolific Posner on Plagiarism.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 7:54 am
So now we're up to Truman, Ike and JFK. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 2:56 pm
Most of the opposition to Truman came from people we would today call hawks who agreed with Gen. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 11:14 am
It's not the broken promises and the outright lying, although we're getting close. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 6:14 am
It's not the broken promises and the outright lying, although we're getting close. [read post]
24 Sep 2006, 6:47 pm
Digital Access to Archival Works: Could 108(b) Be the Solution? [read post]
