Search for: "IN RE YEAGER " Results 21 - 40 of 53
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2013, 8:50 am by emagraken
Yeager Properties Inc.) the Defendant owned a bakery in Chemainus, BC. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Ilya Somin
I think the best answer is given in Chuck Yeager’s autobiography, which I recently read: If you love the hell out of what you’re doing, you’re usually pretty good at it, and you end up making your own breaks…. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Welcome from ANABob Liodice, President and CEO, ANA Liodice made an interesting point: by taking the lead in self-regulation, US advertisers/groups become models worldwide, and that has important consequences for how self-regulation can substitute for government regulation in countries that don’t have a First Amendment and aren’t particularly constrained in what they could make advertisers do if they decided to. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am by Anna Christensen
United StatesDocket: 09-1554Issue(s): 1) Whether the Supreme Court's decision in Yeager v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 5:51 am by Steve McConnell
Heck, we're huge fans of Chuck Yeager, Jerry West, and Don Knotts. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 4:29 pm by Andis Kaulins
Yeager and Other Letters Re Liberty article "Libertarianism and Intellectual Property" - Stephan Kinsella - Mises Economics Blog [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 6:20 am by Teri Rodriguez
While you're there, consider adding a law firm link too. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 12:45 pm
Know this: If you compare your product, service or breakthrough to Chuck Yeager's breaking of the sound barrier, you're probably going to wind up in court. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:04 pm
On Thursday, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Yeager v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 11:24 am
  But, note that the Supreme Court has said that Scott Yeager, one of the "Enron Broadband" defendants, cannot be retried, ending a half-decade of uncertainty for the defendant. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 1:38 am
 Here's a recap of the collateral estoppel argument before the SCOTUS in  Yeager  v. [read post]