Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. G."
Results 21 - 40
of 6,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2010, 2:07 am
What is interesting, however, is that one thing they aren't trying are cloud services. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:14 pm
Section 2-1106(b)(3)(B) provides that the disclaimed interest passes as if S had predeceased T. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
The decision discusses alleged conflicting or at least diverging application of G 1/92, as well as G 1/92 itself, in detail. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:03 am
As we previously reported, GWG defaulted on $13.6 million in interest payments in January to bondholders. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:16 am
G: If it was necessary in the interests of national security.E: Is that legal? [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:57 pm
(SNFT.UL) for backdating of stock options and violations of Regulation G which governs non-GAAP financial measures such as EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization). [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Hence, the board concludes that the requirements of R 99(1)(a) are met and thereby follows the jurisprudence established in decisions T 920/97 [1], T 475/07 [1.1] and T 1519/08 [2.1]). [2.2.3] Moreover, the board does not agree that the appeal proceedings should be stayed in view of decision T 445/08, pending as referral G 1/12. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
I may be wrong but I think there is some tension between G 1/03 and G 2/10. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:13 am
In decision T 438/19 Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.03 has ex officio (!) [read post]
20 May 2009, 6:18 pm
Borrowers don’t have to pay interest on ARC loans. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 6:31 pm
Regulators are looking whether a Barclays trader in Europe worked with counterparts at Crédit Agricole, HSBC, Deutsche Bank and Société Générale to manipulate interest rates. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 6:31 pm
Regulators are looking whether a Barclays trader in Europe worked with counterparts at Crédit Agricole, HSBC, Deutsche Bank and Société Générale to manipulate interest rates. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 7:23 am
An interesting question following G 1/22 was the potential impact (if any) on the high-profile CRISPR dispute. [read post]
23 May 2014, 8:28 am
What's interesting to me is that, for once, a carrier also explicitly details those things which don't trigger a Special Enrollment, most notably: "Voluntarily ending coverage. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 11:00 am
The recent referral to the Enlarged Board of appeal (EBA) pending as G 1/10 has drawn some attention to the difficulties that may arise when the Examining Division (ED) acts under R 140 during opposition proceedings. [read post]
14 May 2020, 8:52 am
Rule 28(2) EPC was introduced by decision of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation and came into force on 1 July 2017.In 2015, the Enlarged Board had concluded in its decisions G 2/12 and G 2/13 within the then applicable legal framework, i.e. before the introduction of Rule 28(2) EPC, that the non‑patentability of essentially biological processes for the production of plants or animals under Article 53(b) EPC did not extend… [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 8:04 am
Well, we had our G+ hangout on the JOBS Act yesterday. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:33 am
Fethullah Gülen’s remarks came in an interview he gave to the Deutsch-Türkische Nachrichten (DTN) news portal. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
This decision contains interesting paragraphs both on reformatio in peius and disclaimers.On March 11, 2003, the Opposition Division (OD) had maintained the patent in amended form.The opponent filed an appeal.In a first decision (T 724/03) the Board held that the disclaimer allowed by the OD did not contravene A 123. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:27 pm
Julie Garber reports that Alex G. [read post]
