Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF R. D. ET AL., CHILDREN (MOTHER)" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Law Lady
., Appellee. 1st District.Administrative law -- Agency for Health Care Administration -- Revocation of assisted living facility licenses, denial of licensure renewal applications, and imposition of administrative fines -- Claims against licensee were not proven where only evidence to support claims was uncorroborated hearsay -- Claim that licensee operated another assisted living facility without obtaining a valid license or qualifying for a license exemption was not proven where evidence was… [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:44 am by Brian Raum
Consider this finding from Kristin Anderson Moore, et al., in 2002: “it is not simply the presence of two parents…, but the presence of two biological parents that seems to support children’s development… [R]esearch clearly demonstrates that family structure matters for children, and the family structure that helps children the most is a family headed by two biological parents in a low-conflict marriage. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 11:48 am
As depicted in this YouTube video, the trapped protestors – and those on balconies above – waved Algerian and Tunisian flags and chanted “Djazaïr, horra, dimocratia. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm by Law Lady
Department of Children And Families ,(Fla.App. 4 Dist.)Government - Agency was not required to pay any fees for establishment of special needs pooled trust for developmentally disabled teenager.In a matter of first impression, the District Court of Appeal of Florida has held that the Department of Children and Families, as trustee of a master trust into which a developmentally disabled teenager's Social Security disability benefits were paid, was not required to pay any… [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
§ 35.150(d), are enforceable by private right of action.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for Disability Rights Advocates et al.Amicus brief for Richard M. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
Attorney’s Office described their alleged criminal acts as follows: Taking action to remove funding for the Luzerne County juvenile detention facility, effectively closing that facility; Ordering juveniles to be sent to the facilities in which they had a financial interest even when juvenile probation officers did not recommend detention; Entering a “Placement Guarantee Agreement” to house children in a facility in which the judges had an interest,… [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
“The additional environmental projects included in the settlement will protect children, pregnant mothers, local residents and workers from harmful pollution and are an example of securing public health and environmental benefits in addition to those achieved by compliance with our nation’s environmental laws. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
”… "In establishing the federal standard the CPSC expressed its desire to reduce by the least burdensome means the substantial number of injuries caused by children playing with disposable lighters. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 12:42 am
Thus, Kendall-Tackett, et al. concluded that a lack of symptoms could not [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:57 am
We the People did not want to see any more ads and money wasted on ads, be it from Chrysler, et al, or from your own pocket. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
They used billboards with pictures of mothers and children to draw a comparison between pasteurized milk and irradiation. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:13 pm
" In Save the Valley, Inc., Thomas and Jae Breitweiser, et al v. [read post]