Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF PAUL BISHOP" Results 21 - 40 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2017, 1:23 pm
Nor is it Episcopal, since it is not led by any Bishop (in the sense of 1 Timothy 3) -- no such bishop worthy of Paul's description would ever have allowed any such liturgical error to take place. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 10:10 am by David Pocklington
If any question is raised concerning the observance of the provisions of this Canon it may be referred to the bishop in order that he may give such pastoral guidance, advice or directions as he may think fit, but such reference shall be without prejudice to the matter in question being made the subject matter of proceedings under the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Measure 1963.5. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:23 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
McMurry argues that the document imposed the highest level of secrecy on such matters and reflected a Vatican policy barring bishops from reporting abuse to police. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 9:49 pm
The Diocese of South Carolina is a constituent part of The Episcopal Church, and that status cannot be altered without the action of General Convention.The disciplinary processes of this Church carefully considered the matters with which Bishop Lawrence was charged, and the Disciplinary Board found that he had indeed repudiated the polity of this Church. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:30 pm
Paul's admonition to Christians to settle their disputes outside of the secular courts.Herewith, then, from a specifically canonical point of view, follows a chronological summary of the ups and downs of the Episcopal Church (USA) in 2011, with links to the posts that discuss the desultory details: January - Judge Chupp grants summary judgment to ECUSA in the Ft. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 12:34 pm
Paul chastised the church in Corinth for failing to live in peace and concord as Christ’s body. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
Paul’s Parish in Visalia, California, in Tulare County Superior Court (2010); St. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Paul’s Parish in Visalia, CA, in Tulare County Superior Court (2010); plaintiffs are the remnant diocese of San Joaquin and its bishop; case is stayed pending the outcome of No. 11 above19. [read post]
24 May 2014, 7:00 am by Ritika Singh
Bobby linked to the DOJ’s press release on the matter. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Pehrson, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop v. [read post]