Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE A GRAND JURY." Results 21 - 40 of 989
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2013, 3:41 pm
The law is clear that a grand jury proceeding is defective when the defendant is not accorded an opportunity to appear and to testify before the grand jury in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law (CPL). [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 1:12 pm by John Floyd
  Courts Can Release Grand Jury Testimony   The question is whether the Court has the authority to order the Attorney General to release the grand jury material inasmuch as Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure encases grand jury proceedings in secrecy. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:28 am by Kelsey Clinton
As an initial matter, Rogers considers the committee’s request that the district court summarizes the argument, “exercise its continuing supervisory jurisdiction concerning the grand jury to authorize and order the release of grand jury records. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 9:10 am by Randall Hodgkinson
  The KSC concluded that targets of grand jury proceedings are entitled to due process and that introduction of extraneous matters violates due process:[O]ur statutes contemplate that due process mandates that a Kansas grand jury should only issue an indictment based on legal evidence, rather than suspicion or conjecture.As a result, the KSC agreed that dismissal of the indictment was an appropriate disposition in this case. [read post]
20 May 2020, 2:06 pm by Amy Howe
The committee argued that the release was appropriate under a portion of Rule 6(e) that allows courts to disclose grand jury materials “preliminarily to or in connection with a judicial proceeding. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:20 am by SHG
From Plaintiff’s perspective, although the release of a large number of records provides an appearance of transparency, with heavy redactions and the absence of context, those records do not fully portray the proceedings before the grand jury. 34. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 2:41 pm
As its legal advisor, the prosecutor "must instruct the grand jury concerning the law with respect to its duties and any matter before it. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
The government's need for the secrecy of the grand jury proceedings is protected by temporarily restraining Twitter from divulging any information about the underlying grand jury subpoena until after this Court issues a final ruling in this matter. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:19 am
"[M]any appeals involving grand jury proceedings" will still "become moot after the return of an indictment" because grand jury proceedings will have concluded. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:10 am by Mike Scarcella
But Cooke also noted secrecy is no longer necessary when the contents of grand jury matters have become public. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:08 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Respondents here, relying only on the statutory provisions cited, do not contend in either of the cases now before us that the papers furnished to them failed to provide the notice to which they were constitutionally entitled and that they were accordingly entitled to copies of the Grand Jury minutes as a matter of constitutional right; indeed there is nothing in the record in either case on which such a contention could be premised. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 6:56 am by Lawrence Kasperek
The prosecutor offered defendant the opportunity to testify before the grand jury before it filed the indictment, but refused defendant’s request to testify before a different grand jury. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:26 pm
P. 6(e)(3)(E)(ii), discovery of grand jury proceedings may be granted where "a ground may exist to dismiss the indictment because of a matter that occurred before the grand jury. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:30 pm
Moreover, contrary to the appellants’ contentions, the instructions given to the grand jury are entitled to a presumption of confidentiality, since CPL 190.25(4) affords protection to all “matter attending a grand jury proceeding” including records that were not even entered into evidence before the grand jury. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 Sometimes, counsel who is not present at arraignment is assigned thereafter, but never meets with the defendant before the grand jury votes an indictment. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 5:53 am by Daniel Spiegel
This practice is referred to as “voluntary dismissal to the grand jury” (VDGJ) or “dismissal for possible indictment. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:30 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Finally, it must be noted that Criminal Procedure Law § 190.25(4) provides: "Grand jury proceedings are secret, and no grand juror or other person specified in subdivision three 2 may, except in the lawful discharge of his duties or upon written order of the court, disclose the nature or substance of any grand jury testimony, or any decision, result or other matter attending a grand jury proceeding. [read post]