Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF R. E. J."
Results 21 - 40
of 1,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
As an example, unless the conditions of R 20(3) EPC [1973] are met, it is the person registered as applicant, i.e. the person whose name is entered into the Register, who is the party to the proceedings and who is deemed to be entitled to exercise the right to the European patent, in accordance with A 60(3) EPC [1973] (J 26/95 [2]), irrespective of whether or not the right to a European patent belongs to him as a matter of substance (see A 60(1)). [9] As to the public… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:45 pm
Christopher J. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:26 am
R. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
Ben R. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
Ben R. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:08 am
On December 31, 2021, Edmund J. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
R. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:50 pm
DEADLINE to submit comments (informal, individuals, associations, formal, any) is MAY 2 DRAFT N J L A L E T T E R H E A D Federal Trade Commission Office of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex D) 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20580 Re: Google Buzz, File No.1023136 To the FTC: The New Jersey Library Association submits this comment on the proposed consent order, In the Matter of Google Inc., File No. 1023136, between the FTC and… [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 10:23 am
This is a case filed by William Power Maloney against the estate of E. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 10:45 am
DOREEN DISALVATORE IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS J. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
J 37/89 [3.5]). [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:54 pm
J. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
” Pursuant to R 99(2), “[i]n the statement of grounds of appeal the appellant shall indicate the reasons for setting aside the decision impugned, or the extent to which it is to be amended, and the facts and evidence on which the appeal is based. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:19 am
Selna and Andrew J. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 8:56 pm
David E. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:33 pm
Anthony 2009 Link The Law of Partnerships and Corporations, Second Edition van Duzer, J. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 8:17 am
Remanded.Case Name: JAMES E. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 5:00 am
Judge Terrence R. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:48 am
Does it matter if you are “only” outside counsel? [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
As, pursuant to A 121(4), inter alia, the time limit for requesting further processing is excluded from further processing, it follows e contrario from R 136(3) that re-establishment into the time limit for requesting further processing is admissible. [read post]
