Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF WHITTINGTON"
Results 21 - 40
of 234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Section 3.1.2 of the Handbook guarantees that "all faculty members are entitled to freedom in the classroom in discussing their subject, but they should be careful not to introduce into their teaching controversial matter which has no relation to their subject. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 12:20 pm
The school as such could not prefer Black Lives Matter posters to MAGA hats, and could not base employment decisions on such preferences. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 11:05 am
When a government employee speaks in his or her personal capacity about a matter of public concern, the courts recognize some First Amendment interest against reprisal by the governmental employer. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Professor Whittington found the “theoretical structure [regarding democracy] . . . [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 11:42 am
These are matters on which reasonable people of goodwill in our community of teachers and learners disagree. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 8:55 am
Whittington (Princeton University - Department of Political Science) has posted What Can Professors Say in Public? [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 9:24 am
Supreme Court has also recognized a limited First Amendment right for government employees to speak about matters of public concern. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 11:51 am
(Note that I've consulting for FIRE on various matters, but not on this case, and no-one asked me to blog about it.) [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 5:55 pm
As I noted in my post on the related contraceptives question, Keith Whittington blogged yesterday about the University of Idaho General Counsel's Office letter that said professors were limited in their classroom discussions of abortion. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 4:40 pm
Keith Whittington blogged yesterday about the University of Idaho General Counsel's Office letter that said professors were limited in their classroom discussions of abortion, and others have written about it extensively as well. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 1:47 pm
Teachers are entitled to freedom in the classroom in discussing their subject, but they should be careful not to introduce into their teaching controversial matter which has no relation to their subject. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:14 am
Academic freedom in state universities would be a matter of grace. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 8:00 am
Since state universities are also governmental actors, and state universities maintain social media accounts, it was only a matter of time before these questions intersected with campus speech disputes. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 9:01 am
Our conversation explores the issue of political statements by university leaders and the logic behind the 1967 Kalven Report from the University of Chicago, which emphasized that universities as such should generally not take positions on matters of contested public policy and should understand their mission as providing a home for students and scholars who hold a diverse range of views on such issues. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
Of course, it isn't the particular terminology that matters, but the substance of the distinction is not something that legal theorists can do without. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
" Keith Whittington has written about some of these laws as applied to universities; I'll speak about that in a separate post. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm
This is a libel claim by Labour MP Naz Shah against a Conservative Party activist over a tweet which is alleged to have accused her of supporting “vandalism” by Black Lives Matters protestors. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 8:27 am
It is not hard to see how this assertion of a unilateral power to reassign instructors who offend their students could have sweeping consequences for the freedom of university professors to teach contentious subject matter. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 2:00 am
Therefore, Tyson’s recertification request was reasonable as a matter of law and didn’t interfere with Whittington’s FMLA rights. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 10:43 am
SUNY Fredonia issued a denunciation via tweet which concluded that "the matter is being reviewed. [read post]
