Search for: "INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO V US"
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
The Boeing Co [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
App. 2003); Dole Food Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Earlier this year we noted a conference on "The Law and the Child in Historical Perspective," co-sponsored by the University of Minnesota Law School and History Department, the Childhood and Youth Studies Across the Disciplines IAS Research Collaborative at the University of Minnesota, the Indiana University School of Law, the University of Pennsylvania Law School and History Department, the University of Illinois College of Law, the University of Michigan… [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
Feb. 28, 2014)), Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and West Virginia. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Some states qualify their safe harbors with modifying adverbs, such as "specifically," "expressly," or "affirmatively" (Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New Mexico, Ohio, Tennessee, Utah). [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
There’s nothing it can do about it, since it has no control over the competitor – short of closing its eyes to a potentially breakthrough new use for its product.DDLaw, More Thoughts On Conte v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
John's University, "Presidential Peace Powers. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm
Crawford v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm
O' Hair Professor of Evidence & Procedure, Michigan State University School of Law. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm
Title: Beer v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 1:24 pm
Power Co. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
Appalachian Power Co., [256 S.E.2d 879, 887 (W. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Justice Department, and the state of Indiana announced that Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $950,000 and install and upgrade pollution control technology at its two coal-fired power plants in Indiana to resolve violations of the Clean Air Act. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
– John Fllesher, The Associated Press, April 23, 2010 A federal bankruptcy judge approved a deal with the government on Friday that requires Lyondell Chemical Co. to pay $103 million toward the cleanup of a polluted 80-mile section of the Kalamazoo River in southwest Michigan. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
Click Here Settlement Agreement for Recovery of Past Response Costs Colorado Bumper Exchange Site, Pueblo, Pueblo County, CO. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
The agreement, filed in federal court in Kansas, resolves violations of the Clean Air Act’s New Source Review requirements at the company’s Jeffrey Energy Center, a coal-fired power plant near St. [read post]
