Search for: "Ian Bartrum" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2010, 6:52 pm by Dan Markel
Joining us for the first time, we have Robin Effron (Brooklyn Law); Darren Rosenblum (Pace); Aaron Bruhl (Houston); Andrew Coan (Wisconsin/Michigan); and Ian Bartrum (Drake). [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Dwyer, No Accounting for School Vouchers, (Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 48, 2013).Ian C. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Bartrum, Religion and the Restatements, (Brooklyn Law Review, Forthcoming).Richard W. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 7:05 am by Northwestern University Law Review
In the first article, Professor Ian Bartrum discusses how the victory for religious groups may not really be a victory, since the endorsement test now looks to the secularization of religious symbols. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 11:15 pm
Eberle, German Religious Freedoms: The Movement Toward Protection of Minorities, (Oregon Review of International Law, Forthcoming).Ian C. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Vijaykumar Shrikrushna Chowbe, Struggle to Combat ‘Graded Inequality’ in India: Conflict Without Consensus, (July 24, 2012).Ian C. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:52 pm by Richard Albert
Here are just a few of them: New Law Professors panel assembled from a call for papers on transformative law; Law and Interpretation panel, featuring a wonderful cast that includes one of my favorite law/politics scholars, Keith Bybee; National Security Law panel, involving PrawfsBlawgger (and my schoolmate) Steve Vladeck; and Constitutional Law panel on the distinction between "constitutional interpretation" and "constitutional construction," with a superstar group of… [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Bartrum, The Curious Case of Legislative Prayer: Town of Greece v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:56 am by Bridget Crawford
The Appointments Committee members are Francine Lipman (chair), Rachel Anderson, Ian Bartrum, Mary Beth Beazley, Lydia Nussbaum, and Jeff Stempel. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:13 am by Amy Howe
” At PrawfsBlawg, Ian Bartrum discusses the challenge to the University of Texas at Austin’s consideration of race in its undergraduate admissions process and its relationship to the legacy of Plessy v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Bartrum, Nonpublic Reasons and Political Paradigm Change, (St. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:04 am by Adam Chandler
  On PrawfsBlawg, Ian Bartrum analyzes Justice Kennedy’s justifications for overruling Austin v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:17 am by Nancy Rapoport
  16 articles, one book in progress (NYU Press).Ian Bartrum, Drake University Law School. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At Prawfsblawg, Ian Bartrum proposes a a “possible structural reform” to address the “intense politicization of the Supreme Court,” suggesting that “cases could be heard and decided by panels consisting of some smaller number of Justices. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:48 am by Steve Lubet
David Abraham, Professor of Law Emeritus, University of Miami School of Law Jeffrey Abramson, Professor of Law & Government, University of Texas at Austin School of Law Bruce Ackerman, Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science, Yale Law School Neal Allen, Chair and Associate Professor of Political Science, Wichita State University William Araiza, Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School Sahar Aziz, Professor of Law, Rutgers Law School Asli Bâli, Professor of Law, UCLA School… [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:51 pm by Rick Hills
Given that Larry, Mitch Berman, Ian Bartrum, Laura Cisneros, Amy Barrett, and I are all panelists at the AALS conference charged with discussing "The Interpretation – Construction Distinction in Constitutional Law" (on Saturday, January 9th) and given that Mitch and Larry have tussled over Larry's originalist argument in print, this seems like a good opportunity to provoke some pre-conference discussion on a linguistic issue close to my heart -- the principle… [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
The ministerial exception gives religious organizations freedom to discriminate any way they want, leaving the plaintiffs without any legal recourse, even if racial discrimination is at stake.In 2011, as the Supreme Court was deciding its first, 2012 case, my UNLV colleague, Ian Bartrum, wrote an article called Religion and Race: The Ministerial Exception Reexamined (2011). [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 4:12 am
Court of Appeals Clerkship DRAKE Ian C. [read post]