Search for: "In Re Application of Lawrence" Results 21 - 40 of 505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2011, 7:31 am by Dennis Crouch
However, on that same day Crayola filed a re-exam 95/001,582 which asserts anticipation and obviousness. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:38 am by Lawrence Higgins
 The Patent Reform legislation will allow the PTO to keep fees they receive from applicants in an account that Congress can’t touch. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 5:12 am
"There was one big problem with that argument: as Examining Attorney Susan Kastriner Lawrence pointed out, neither the application nor the cited registration contained any limitations on the nature of the goods or the channels of trade. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:20 am
entry=453, the “Bank Overdraft” litigation pending before Senior Judge James Lawrence King of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in MDL No. 2036: In re Checking Account Overdraft Litigation has significant  arbitration related issues and is already shaping up to fertile ground for post-Concepcion issues. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 12:59 am by David Pocklington
Discussion The Chancellor stated that the CBC was supported in the views it expressed by the decision In Re St Lawrence Oakley with Wootton St Lawrence [2014] Court of Arches (14 April 2014); this is reviewed in our case note, Sale of Church Treasures  (21 April 2014) [20]. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 1:04 am
Lawrence thinks of the judicial system? [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 10:16 am by Lawrence Higgins
Schmidt's suggest that the best way to address the problem is to take the patents as they're published and crowdsource them. [read post]
19 Sep 2015, 10:54 pm by Patricia Salkin
Therefore, plaintiff could only pursue claims relating to the following events, which were within the three-year limitations period: the Zoning Board’s October 2011 decision denying plaintiff’s variance application, and plaintiff’s pending “as-of-right” application. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:01 am by Michael Lowe
The Government, however, believed that the Jane Does simply didn’t have “standing” to bring a federal lawsuit even though the CVRA (d)(5) specifically authorizes a crime victim to make an application to “re-open” a plea deal if the NPA was violated. [read post]
9 May 2008, 1:10 pm
*R:My FilesBlogspotBlogltr.OtherLessonofMunich.doc* * This posting represents the personal views of Lawrence R. [read post]
9 May 2008, 1:10 pm
*R:My FilesBlogspotBlogltr.OtherLessonofMunich.doc* * This posting represents the personal views of Lawrence R. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
In re Lawrence Foods, Inc., Serial No. 86937640 (July 20, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:31 am by Dennis Crouch
Under this option, applications would be processed within a year of filing. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Myth 4: “But surely free speech lets you defend yourself if you’re attacked? [read post]
2 May 2007, 10:17 am
See, e.g., In re Deuel, 51 F.3d 1552, 1559 (Fed. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 2:16 am by gmlevine
Lawrence-Dahl Companies, 347 F.3d 370 (2nd Cir. 2003) the Second Circuit held that “the res judicata effect of the First Action [relating to domain names] is not dispositive in the Instant Action as Cello may have a claim premised on facts arising after the First Action. [read post]