Search for: "In Matter of Robert Strickland"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
The petition asks if an appellate court violates Strickland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:36 pm
If you're poor and not yet convicted, you may get the benefit of a Strickland v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
He is scheduled to testify in pre-trial matters in the coming days.) [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
He is scheduled to testify in pre-trial matters in the coming days.) [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:40 am
Roberts, Executive Director, National Basketball Players Association (“NBPA”)DeMaurice F. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Supreme Court -- The relevant clearly established federal law is standard for ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland, which requires a showing of “both deficient performance by counsel and prejudice” JEFF PREMO, SUPERINTENDENT, OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Petitioner v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
Cooper rendered deficient performance under the first prong of Strickland. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm
It will rest, at least for the relatively short term, with the Roberts Court. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
In this case, the trial attorney, Larry English, knew that the client, Robert McCoy, opposed the plan to tell the jury that McCoy was in fact the killer. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 3:25 am
The present appeal involves only Crawford’s conviction for raping Roberts. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
to resolve whether that exception exists as a constitutional matter. [read post]
16 May 2008, 9:41 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Robert Whitehead v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 10:11 pm
As a matter of fact, in some jurisdictions, a misdemeanor can be punishable by up to 3 years imprisonment (I use imprisonment generically). [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984), rather than Strickland v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
Roberts, Jr., swiftly retorted: “How can you say that this brings us closer to a situation where race will not matter when it expands the number of situations in which redistricting authorities have to consider race? [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:50 am
Holder is that the Roberts Court is no friend of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:06 pm
WOODWARD, and ROBERT C. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Further, the Court found that the court’s in-chambers conferences dealing with purely legal matters did not violate Mr. [read post]
