Search for: "In Re: Judicial Mandatory Continuing Legal Education"
Results 21 - 40
of 188
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
First, continue to strengthen our borders. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 12:49 pm
“mandatory”, in relation to its tariffs - or more precisely “not mandatory” - in this Report – which was the essence of the SCC case. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
" The amended complaint is not a model of clarity or concision, and it does not confine itself to legal argument. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
" The amended complaint is not a model of clarity or concision, and it does not confine itself to legal argument. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) ("Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities? [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am
The hearing continues: watch this space. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:45 am
Somehow I think we’re likely to talk about that again soon. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 8:46 am
The judicial branch is in charge of administering justice. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 4:06 pm
This past March, for instance, even the ABA Journal featured a Paradigm Shift Series, to show “how traditional U.S. legal education paradigms, driven by federal loan underwriting, are not responding to the market forces as law schools continue to add students and raise tuition rates in a mature legal services industry. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 8:09 am
You’ll want to attend the second mandatory class—the debtor education course—and submit the certificate before finishing your repayment plan. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:45 am
A court’s review of a decision of the Commissioner of Human Rights is not whether the court would have reached the same result but was the Commissioner's determination rational in light of the evidence presented A court's review of a college’s or university’s disciplinary action against a student limited to whether it complied with its own rules in the process A public school district is not an "education corporation or association" within… [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:45 am
A court’s review of a decision of the Commissioner of Human Rights is not whether the court would have reached the same result but was the Commissioner's determination rational in light of the evidence presented A court's review of a college’s or university’s disciplinary action against a student limited to whether it complied with its own rules in the process A public school district is not an "education corporation or association" within… [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:00 am
Societal and institutional consequences of shifting away from resolving disputes in adversarial and/or public proceedings: E.g., examining the jurisprudential and political effects of such a shift presently and prospectively; comparing due process protections and equality imbalances in adversarial and inquisitorial proceedings drawing on court case studies from abroad and administrative agency examples domestically; weighing the jurisprudential and practical effects of trial judges assuming an… [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm
However, Canada is not immune from foreign and even domestic pressures to make it work much less well:Will Canada agree via CETA or TPP to permit “ex officio” border enforcement actions – i.e. officials acting on their own with their limited legal training and without judicial oversight – to stop al [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 9:19 am
This process—which is only legally mandatory for a subset of clearance holders but is generally available to all who held security clearances—provides former employees with an administrative mechanism through which they can secure U.S. government review and approval of their manuscripts in advance of publication. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 6:27 am
The first is the possibility of introducing mandatory reporting in respect of compliance with certain labour standards. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 1:14 am
: on the effects of the Supreme Court’s judgment in Allister & Peeples, Re Applications for Judicial Reviews (Northern Ireland) [2023] UKSC 5 on the legality of the Northern Ireland Protocol. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:21 am
And if “one thing is perfectly clear: Plaintiffs’ attorneys have scorned their oath, flouted the rules,” there is no continuing legal education class that magically makes its student ethical. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 1:19 pm
Interestingly, there have been a lot of withdrawn tariffs – perhaps somehow arising from the Supreme Court’s ruling that Board tariffs are not legally mandatory for users. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:34 pm
Several provisions continue to stand out. 1. [read post]
