Search for: "In Re: 14 Realty Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2012, 2:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Assoc. v G & E Realty, Inc., 56 AD3d 372, 372-373; Plemmenou v Arvanitakis, 39 AD3d 612, 613; Petracca v Petracca, 305 AD2d 566, 567; Glenesk v Guidance Realty Corp., 36 AD2d 852, 853), albeit without prejudice to Hurst's right to replead those affirmative defenses in proper form (see Consolidated Constr. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:34 am by Peter Mahler
The point is, given the discrete, fixed-in-time nature of the oppressive acts, rare is the minority shareholder who doesn’t know they’re being oppressed when they’re being oppressed. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" Notice of entry of an order only affects the time to appeal and the time to re-argue. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:47 am
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 14, 2008 Stroman Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Pa. 2003) passim In re Ormet Corp., 324 B.R. 645 (Bankr. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
National Realty Corp., 38 A.3d 1018, 1026 n.10 (Pa. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Jordan Bierkos
I mention this point for context because the Alberta Courts considers “improvement” from the perspective of the “overall project” involved: Re Davidson Well Drilling Limited, 2016 ABQB 416 at para 79 [Davidson Well Drilling]. [read post]