Search for: "In Re: Allen v." Results 21 - 40 of 1,031
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2024, 7:22 am
 At 1:38, the words on screen are "Mitt Romney and the Republican Party... plan to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Others have gone down this dubious path before, but these authors’ embrace of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ opinion in Bendectin litigation reveals the insubstantiality and the invalidity of their method.[18] As Professor Ronald Allen put the matter: “Given the weight of evidence in favor of Bendectin’s safety, it seems peculiar to argue for mosaic evidence [WOE] from a case in which it would have plainly been misleading. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm by Bryn Hines
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 11:34 am
" Unless we're adding AKAs to every single lawsuit, which just seems weird.Anyway. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Efforts like the Ethics Guide for Trustworthy AI assume the regulatory role of Miss Millie.[8]   Jan Broekman takes us to the edge of that gap between the human, and their technologies of re-production and memory, their elaborate systems of subjectivity that has moved humanity to the construction of virtual imaginaries of itself. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
Which is not to say they’re unimportant – just a lot less captivating than the brain candy that came before. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Safeguards under the Investigatory Powers Act for journalistic material gathered in bulk by UK intelligence agencies will be re-examined in the High Court. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
  If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am by Josh Blackman
" Chief Justice Roberts wrote two election-law decisions this term, Allen v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 12:15 am
  If this reminds anyone of Chancellor Allen's ruling in In re Caremark Int'l Inc. [read post]