Search for: "In Re: Amendment of Section 9 of the Internal Operating Procedures of the Supreme Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Supreme Court The U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
Supreme Court decision, a federal judge in San Francisco has ruled. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
The three sources of international law are stated and defined in the Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (R3dFRLUS), Section 102. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
Appeal against order that CPS should disclose to wife documents which they had obtained from foreign states pursuant to letters of request under section 7 of Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
The course has also expanded from its original narrow and technical focus, to a broader focus on principles and the use of language and logic to build and operate a system of law. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Supreme Court, June 18, 2008 Munaf v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Supreme Court, May 19, 2008 US v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
Article II, section 13 of the bylaws provides: Arbitration. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:18 pm
" The Supreme Court also agreed with the Court of Chancery that the bylaw amendment, that purported to reduce the size of the board as a means of eliminating sitting directors, was in violation of DGCL Section 109(b). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
GA Code § 17-7-54 How does the special purpose grand jury operate? [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are no CEQA cases pending at the California Supreme Court. 3. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
” This is particularly clear from the language in the subsection titled “Procedural Posture, Evergreen’s Contentions, and Civil Code Section 3482? [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus NEW PRIME INC. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
Copyright Office 512 Study, April 1, 2016: Question 9. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Whitley, No. 06-0131 In a criminal law matter, petition for review of decision denying rehearing is denied where the court declined to depart from the literal wording of the "except" clause of 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1)(A). . [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The European Court of Human Rights emphasised that the authorities had a duty to provide an effective procedure for obtaining access to such information and that their failure to provide for an effective and accessible procedure to enable the applicant to obtain access to his personal security files within a reasonable time constituted a violation of Article 8. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
The County relied on a negative declaration for each of the first two amendments and found the third amendment was exempt. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
P. 26(b)(3)(A); Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules—1970 Amendment; 8 FED. [read post]
