Search for: "In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of Judicial Administration and the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure"
Results 21 - 40
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Epps, No. 0860652 In an Eight Amendment challenge to lethal injection as the method of execution for two death-row inmates, rulings that the applicable statute of limitations barred plaintiffs' section 1983 action and grant of summary judgment to defendant are affirmed where: 1) under Wilson v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 11:48 am
HB 413 attempts to statutorily reverse this ruling as well by amending F.S. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
SATZ, State Attorney for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida, and JOSEPH MATTHEWS, Appellees. 4th District.Appeals -- Timeliness -- Appellant's notice of appeal failed to timely invoke court's jurisdiction to review final administrative order -- Premature -- Agency order on appellant's motion to vacate final order has not been rendered by agency and therefore the appeal from this order is premature --… [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
Kemp, which ruled that even solid statistical evidence of racial disparities in the administration of the death penalty did not violate the Constitution. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
Oregon Healthcare Res., 6 No. 18 Westlaw Journal Medical Malpractice 1, Westlaw Journal Medical Malpractice February 11, 2011An Oregon couple who conceived a child after being told that the husband's vasectomy was successful are seeking more than $675,000 in child-rearing expenses from the doctor who allegedly botched the procedure. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Circuit Court, 4th Judicial Circuit (Appellate) in and for Duval County. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Alexander, No. 06-1867 A sentence for sexual abuse of a minor is vacated and remanded where the district court plainly erred in failing to provide notice of an upward variance as required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(h). [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
Supreme Court, voting 5-4 along ideological lines, has ruled that strip-searches of people arrested for minor offenses does not violate the Fourth Amendment principle against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Fowler, III (Pro Hac Vice)Luis Llamas(Florida Bar No. 89822) 201 St. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:25 am
— … (3) Any interested person on whom a copy of the notice of administration is served must object to the validity of the will, the venue, or the jurisdiction of the court by filing a petition or other pleading requesting relief in accordance with the Florida Probate Rules on or before the date that is 3 months after the date of service of a copy of the notice of administration on the objecting person, or those objections are forever barred. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Leveto, No. 05-4753 Conviction for federal income tax fraud is affirmed where: 1) defendant had knowingly and voluntarily waived his Sixth Amendment right to counsel and, once properly waived, this right is no longer absolute; and 2) there was no reversible error in several rulings regarding a warrant and summons. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
The DC Court noted that the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) provides an interested person with the right to petition for issuance, amendment or repeal of a rule and, if the SEC were to deny the petition, the unsuccessful petitioner could seek review of that decision in the court of appeals after a First Amendment argument has been squarely made to the SEC; “they are not required to violate the regulation and risk prosecution to… [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Administrative law -- Agency for Health Care Administration -- Attorney's fees -- Action arising from Department of Administrative Hearings' finding that AHCA's withdrawal of an application for a home health care facility license, due to what the AHCA perceived as an incomplete application, was incorrect -- Error to award applicant attorney's fees and costs pursuant to section 57.111 despite favorable order from DOAH -- Where, at the time the withdrawal… [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
In 2011, administrative directives were issued to supplement and revise the procedures for the processing of non-dissolution matters. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Smith, No. 06-3112 In a case addressing the constitutionality of a vehicle impoundment under the Fourth Amendment in circumstances in which there was no standardized policy regarding the impoundment and towing of vehicles, the circuit court rules that the constitutionality of a community caretaking impoundment is judged by directly applying the Fourth Amendment, which protects people against "unreasonable" searches and seizures. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
It is the Louisiana Code of Judicial Conduct that sets forth the state’s rules and procedures for allowing cameras in to cover judicial proceedings. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Boards and commissions continue to be allowed to exhibit strong, quasi-judicial powers, in spite of their administrative agency character. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Conley, No. 07-1426 In an interlocutory appeal from a decision finding that a prisoner plaintiff in a suit for damages governed by the Prison Litigation Reform Act is entitled by the Seventh Amendment to a jury trial on any debatable factual issues relating to the defense of failure to exhaust administrative remedies, the ruling is reversed and remanded where: 1) juries decide cases and not issues of judicial traffic control; 2) the court can conduct a hearing on… [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
United States, 13-10639 (third relist), asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – categorically prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with the retroactivity rule set out in Griffith v. [read post]
