Search for: "In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration"
Results 21 - 40
of 239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2023, 12:58 pm
She sues without exhausting her available administrative remedies. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
EPA, the Court considered EPA’s Aircraft Rule, which aligns domestic greenhouse gas emissions rules for aircraft with international emissions standards. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:15 am
Marathe predicts that in the next two to five years, deep fakes will significantly start to affect litigation and pose risks to the judicial process if key players are unprepared. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
And in The Florida Star v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
But they’re wrong for very different reasons. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 1:18 pm
Judicial Review 8315 (2d ed.). [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 5:12 am
Chesebro contended that Thomas would be “our only chance to get a favorable judicial opinion by Jan. 6, which might hold up the Georgia count in Congress. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:25 am
— … (3) Any interested person on whom a copy of the notice of administration is served must object to the validity of the will, the venue, or the jurisdiction of the court by filing a petition or other pleading requesting relief in accordance with the Florida Probate Rules on or before the date that is 3 months after the date of service of a copy of the notice of administration on the objecting person, or those objections are forever barred. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
The Project on Government Oversight noted a provision that allows for the creation of blind trusts that do not comply with existing regulations currently outlined in the Ethics in Government Act, which the bill would amend. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
Florida and the plaintiffs will cross-appeal the 11th Circuit ruling to the Supreme Court in the very near future. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 4:40 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida—and Julie Edelson. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
The lawsuit charges he “is wrongfully retaining Presidential records that are the property of the United States, and which constitute part of the permanent historical record of the prior administration. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 1:56 pm
Long awaited, much anticipated, the Florida Supreme Court (Moto "Undoing Liberal Precedent Since 2018") issued on July 14, 2022 its amendments to the rules of civil procedure (yawn), Florida Rules Of General Practice and Judicial Administration (first we've ever heard of these rules), Rules of Criminal Procedure, Probate Rules (read em before you need em), Rules of… [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Aside from Youngkin each are facing re-election fights this year. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
The same is true for patriots who made constitutional arguments against the international trade embargo before and during the War of 1812, the Texas annexation, the Mexican War, the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, U.S. entry into World War I and the attendant domestic repression of civil liberty, or the judicial abdication of enforcement of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments that allowed Jim Crow to flourish. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 3:07 pm
Florida Bar. 575 U.S.; 135 S. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 12:30 pm
So we'd like the federal courts to vindicate our First Amendment rights. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
The legislation largely mirrors previous bills aimed at reforming judicial ethics at the Supreme Court, but Democrats said there is a new urgency behind the effort amid outcry over revelations involving Ginni Thomas, a Republican activist and the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Those Russian entities, some of whom have been sanctioned by the Biden administration, are able to influence U.S. policy without disclosing details about the scope of their outreach, such as information about the dates of their activities, names of contacts, speeches or internet postings, and specific expenses on behalf of the client, among other activities. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
Critics of the incoming Judicial Review and Courts Bill, which will allow first magistrates’ court appearances in some circumstances to become online administrative hearings, fear this could lead to “justice in the dark” and represents “an affront to open justice. [read post]
