Search for: "In Re: Appointment to Court of Judicial Discipline"
Results 21 - 40
of 221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Guest Blogger This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm
[emphasis added] Similar comments can be found by Justice Farley of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in the Commercial List case of Bell Canada International Inc., Re. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
The Role of the Courts: How Courts Engage With Law: Theories of Judicial Interpretation. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
The more one tethers the Court to the views of the current majority, the less likely it is that the Court will stand up to government excesses.No judicial appointments process is ideal and there are numerous ways to approach the issue. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
The Role of the Courts: How Courts Engage With Law: Theories of Judicial InterpretationWe have been considering the foundations for the peculiar role of courts under the American politico-judicial system. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:42 pm
" In re Gaulkin, 69 N.J. 185, 192 (1973). [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:27 pm
” Not only are all judgments rendered by Moroccan courts issued in the name of the King, but the King also presides over the Conseil Superieur de la Magistrature (High Judicial Council), which is the body that appoints, disciplines, and promotes judges. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 1:30 am
In the April 2020 case of MTV v MEC Health, the Pretoria High Court has once again placed the issue of expert evidence firmly in the judicial spotlight. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:36 pm
But only after taking a step back to re-read the broader economic and political historiography and the historical work in other disciplines, I could take their ideas about judicial independence seriously, and I could see that the concept of judicial independence is malleable and evolving. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 12:32 pm
So it’s a long wait between appointments. [read post]
17 May 2014, 7:49 am
In re Balivet, 2014 VT 41By Andrew DelaneyFour justices were specially assigned for this per curiam (that’s fancy lawyer talk for “by the whole court”) opinion. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 7:14 am
But we’re gradually beginning to see the full scope of the FISA Court’s inadequacy as an oversight institution. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 12:12 pm
By order entered November 28, 2001, this Court appointed a Referee to hear and report on the charges. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Professional and court rules – including the prospect of attorney discipline and Rule 11 sanctions – constrain the conduct of lawyers. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:45 am
They’re elected officials. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 12:07 pm
Thanks again to Eugene for inviting us to guest blog about Judicial Duty and the Supreme Court's Cult of Celebrity this week. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
A simple example: an individual appointed as a provisional or temporary employee in a position in the competitive class does not have the same employee statutory rights as those enjoyed by an individual holding a permanent appointment in the same competitive class title.[12] An individual’s statutory right to many benefits of employment such as eligibility to compete in a promotion examination for a higher grade position, his or her seniority in a layoff situation, and the… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
A simple example: an individual appointed as a provisional or temporary employee in a position in the competitive class does not have the same employee statutory rights as those enjoyed by an individual holding a permanent appointment in the same competitive class title.[12] An individual’s statutory right to many benefits of employment such as eligibility to compete in a promotion examination for a higher grade position, his or her seniority in a layoff situation, and the… [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Again, opposing the party leadership is constitutionally protected against criminal punishment or civil liability, but not against political decisions such as appointment to one or another committee (and, again, same with high-level Executive Branch appointments or judicial appointments). [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 2:00 am
In 1992, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit declined to re-appoint Fred as Federal Public Defender, at a time when assuring the independence, aggressiveness and effectiveness of chief federal public defenders was already a hot topic for criminal defense lawyers. [read post]
