Search for: "In Re: Appointments To The Appellate Court Procedural Rules Committee"
Results 21 - 40
of 159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
Although the majority of judges on the Ninth Circuit were appointed by Democratic presidents, the random draw turned up three Republican-appointed judges for the panel hearing the case.[2] The three Republican appointees then promptly ruled for Trump. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:34 pm
Graham Phillips, the court-appointed amicus curiae arguing on behalf of the petitioner, has barely begun his argument before Katsas interjects. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm
Disputes over the substantive/procedural divide are emerging battlegrounds in 1933 Act suits in state courts. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:04 pm
The government’s efforts to seek re-nomination and re-confirmation of the military judges were prompted by language in a June 2015 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, our federal appellate reviewing court. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
In September, House Rules Chairman James McGovern, Rep. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
We’re talking about the United States Supreme Court. . . . [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
A federal appellate court upheld an FDA rule that applies tobacco regulations to vape products. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (official photo) On Tuesday, I began serializing “Criminal Law 2.0,” a new article by Judge Alex Kozinski — for whom I clerked 20 years ago, who is one of our nation’s most prominent appellate judges and has long been seen as on balance a libertarianish conservative (appointed by President Ronald Reagan). [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:15 am
Accordingly, the Tax Court traditionally has created many of its own rules and procedures, such as ones governing access to its documents. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Levesque, No. 081344 A forfeiture order for $3,068,000 for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana, is vacated and remanded where: 1) 21 U.S.C. section 853 authorizes money judgments; 2) the case is remanded to give district court the opportunity to consider whether and to what extent the ruling in the recent Supreme Court case, US v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am
Although Congress in turn expressly provided the Senate with a cause of action (which, as it happens, is what the court last month suggested the House ought to do), the appellate court ultimately sided with the president anyway. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
P. 23(b)(2) requirements for certification; and 4) remand was necessary for consideration of whether the proposed damages class met the Rule 23(b)(3) requirements. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
In addition, voter-challengers so far have been unable to obtain meaningful discovery through voter-challenge procedures. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
In assessing whether the commissioner breached the duty of procedural fairness, the court considered whether there was a reasonable apprehension of bias towards Mr. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
" Rule 2 of Order XXA provides that award of costs under this Rule shall be in accordance with such rules as the High Court may make in this behalf. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
We continue to await an appellate ruling from the Ninth Circuit, having briefed the court on how recent legislation relates to our claims. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the Court of Claim's ruling. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:18 am
Alters judicial qualifications commission membership and procedures. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 11:01 am
His supporters say that appointing him after a short tenure on an appellate court would give Obama a chance to shape the Supreme Court for decades. [read post]
