Search for: "In Re: Chinese-Manufactured Drywall Products Liability Litigation"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2011, 9:37 am
The consolidated case is In re Chinese-Manufactured Drywall Products Liability Litigation, 2:09-md-02047, U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:01 pm
The post is entitled, "Does the New Product-Liability Boom Lie . . . [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 11:00 am
Unfortunately, a recent opinion, In re: Chinese Manufactured Drywall: Products Liability Litigation, issued December 16, 2010, did not rule in favor of the first party policyholders. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 12:03 am
" Herman said he expects several dozen other Chinese drywall manufacturers to respond to the litigation in coming weeks. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 10:38 am
The problem with that is that the Chinese company will claim the American company cannot re-litigate its case in China after having already fully litigated it on the merits in the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 5:20 am
In December 2010, Chip posted about another Louisiana decision, In re: Chinese Manufactured Drywall: Products Liability Litigation, that also considered whether damage caused by Chinese Drywall was covered under residential Louisiana policies. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 12:00 pm
Eastern District of Louisiana MDL No. 2047, In re Chinese-Manufactured Drywall Products Liability Litig. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 7:26 am
This includes the China importation statement, even though Dorman alleged that this was "an accusation synonymous with inferior products and designed to scare consumers with visions of lead-tainted products, Chinese drywall, and cadmium-laced children's toys," as well as Dayco’s expressed concern that confusion over Dorman products would harm Dayco’s reputation as a provider of superior products. [read post]
