Search for: "In Re: Daniel et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Antitrust at the Agencies Roundup: The Joint FTC/DOJ Guidelines to Nowhere (or Nowhere Good) Edition
22 Jul 2023, 1:01 pm
For a new working paper, see Nathan Miller, et al. here. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
Swaps, like other derivatives, are instruments for (re-)allocating risk. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
Supreme Court.[6] One influential re-articulation came in Wisconsin v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 2:20 am
30-34 Choi, Sung-Soo “Review of the several issues of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, Gachon Law Review 14 (2021), pp. 37-68 (available here) Clavel, Sandrine ; Jault-Seseke, Fabienne “La convention de La Haye du 2 juillet 2019 sur la reconnaissance et l’exécution des jugements étrangers en matière civile ou commerciale : Que peut-on en attendre ? [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 1:31 pm
[3] Ashish Vaswani et al. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
Thomas, Alito, et al that the original (and supposedly widely shared) understanding of some vague constitutional term just happens to align perfectly with the Republican Party's ideological agenda in the 21st century--the Jack Daniel's case is a welcome diversion.At a minimum, the case illustrates that the people who operate Jack Daniel's and/or its corporate overlord Brown-Forman are a bunch of stuffed shirts. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am
Independent MP, Andrew Bridgen, has said he will sue the former Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, for £100,000 in defamation over a tweet in which Hancock accused him of spreading “antisemitic, anti-vax, anti-scientific conspiracy theories. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:32 pm
Au moment de son engagement, l'intéressée n'avait pas de compétence en matière de programmation informatique. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
The villain is the dumbo, Crazy Joe Biden, Low Energy Jeb, Heartless Hilary, Slippery James Comey, Beautiful Ted, High Tax Schumer, Cuban puppet, Mad Alex, Crooked H Flunkie, Angry Democrat Thugs, et al. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
Doctor Moline, why can’t you be true? [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
AL., FEDERAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE: EVIDENCE §5501 (1st ed.) [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 6:45 pm
Source: Robert Morse, et al, “Methodology: 2023 Best Law Schools Rankings,” US News, Mar 28, 2022.One of the consequences of using standardized values is the potential for large interaction effects between the published weight and the range of the underlying distribution. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 3:50 am
Baumeister et al., “Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life,” 8 J Positive Psych 505 (2013). [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 2:47 pm
art. 105 al. 2 LTF). [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
Note: This report was published in partnership with the Centre for Policy Studies, one of the oldest and most influential think tanks in Westminster. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Today [August 11], the Federal Trade Commission initiated a proceeding to examine whether we should implement new rules addressing data practices that are unfair or deceptive. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:20 pm
Ansley of Duane Morris LLP, representing Real Parties (State Water Contractors, Inc. et al) in the case. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:50 am
There is no need to rush through a significant re-write of current U.S. cross-border rules. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
