Search for: "In Re: FDIC"
Results 21 - 40
of 704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2009, 7:46 pm
Now you're talking an amount that justifies some hefty billable hours, contract attorneys locked in a fetid document war room, and paralegals bate-stamping the living stuffing out of every document in sight. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 10:49 am
We discuss each of the three categories of risk identified in the guidance (consumer compliance, third-party, and litigation), plaintiffs’ legal theories in class actions challenging NSF fees, the role of arbitration clauses and contract language in defending class actions, the FDIC’s suggested risk mitigation practices, issues to consider in navigating FDIC expectations for remediation of self-identified NSF fee issues and plaintiffs’ demands in class action… [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 7:36 pm
Sooner or later, no matter how observant or skilled you might be, you're going down. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:00 am
The FDIC proposed rulemaking re-affirms that all equity shareholders and unsecured creditors are at risk for loss and that the general rule will be that their claims will be processed in accordance with the priorities established under the federal bankruptcy code which are the same priorities that the FDIC uses in bank receiverships.The FDIC proposes to confirm that long-term bondholders, subordinated debt holders, and shareholders of a financial company will in… [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 11:57 am
The OCC and FDIC claim that they support efforts of banks to satisfy consumer need for small-dollar credit. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 4:08 am
Because they're so critical to the workings of the U.S. commercial system and stability of society in general, bank insolvencies are treated differently, under different laws, than regular business insolvencies. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 4:08 pm
Adjust your search input if you’re not getting the results you expected. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 12:14 pm
Because the FDIC was discussing the final rule with the OCC until shortly before the OCC issued it and appeared to agree on content but not timing of issuance of the final rule, we believe that it is likely that the FDIC will re-engage on CRA. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 12:47 am
(Very special thanks to Francine McKenna of the re: The Auditors blog for providing me with a copy of the FDIC’s complaint.). [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 6:14 pm
Well, Section 11(d)(14) re-sets when the dial on the stopwatch starts. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 7:56 pm
You're Mr. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 3:56 am
They cite the opening language in Section 11(d)(14) of the FDI Act that says re-setting of the LP Start Date and extension of limitations period apply "notwithstanding any provision of any contract. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:38 pm
If you're not reading FinCri Advisor, you should be. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:08 am
" If you're not a member of TheCorporateCounsel.net, try a '09 no-risk trial to access this webcast for free. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:51 am
Finally, after the tide finally turned at Gettysburg, the increasing likelihood of a Northern victory allowed the British political elites to begin to envision the possibility of a re-united country after the war concluded. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 1:48 am
: Francine McKenna, the author of the re: The Auditors blog, has an interesting October 18, 2012 article in Forbes Magazine entitled “Is the SEC’s Ponzi Crusade Enabling Companies to Cook the Books, Enron-Style? [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:40 pm
They don’t sell to a private investor and they’re criticized by folks like Bonderman (and other private equity heavyweights) for taking a heavier loss than they otherwise would have had to have taken. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:32 am
In the wake of the recent failure of a few banks (including a high-profile closure in Southern California), the pressing question may soon be: It's 2008; do you know where your bank accounts are and whether they're fully FDIC insured? [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 6:56 pm
We're only going to discuss those that involve individuals, retirement accounts, and trusts - both revocable and irrevocable. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:29 am
So if you're waiting for an answer to the question of whether you can sue the FDIC for wrongful repudiation, you're going to have to keep waiting. [read post]
