Search for: "In Re: Grant, J., Appeal of: Grant, J." Results 21 - 40 of 1,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2017, 11:12 am by Ben
 [para 24]Secondly, the order provides for the list of target servers to be "re-set" each match week during the Premier League season. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:03 am
 [para 24]Secondly, the order provides for the list of target servers to be "re-set" each match week during the Premier League season. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
This appeal was directed against the decision of the Receiving Section (RS) refusing a request for re-establishment of rights in relation to the time limit for paying the third-year renewal fee with surcharge in respect of a Euro-PCT application. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:36 am
The Court of Appeal here determined that Arnold J's decision to grant permission was based on a flawed exercise of discretion, inviting him to re-exercise it.Then, on 21 May 2013, Arnold J delivered one of his characteristically Arnoldian epics at [2013] EWHC 1291 (Ch), noted here on 23 May 2013, consisting of no fewer than 326 paragraphs. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am by Nico Cordes
The appeal complies with Articles 106 to 108 and Rule 99 EPC and is therefore admissible.2. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am by Nico Cordes
The appeal complies with Articles 106 to 108 and Rule 99 EPC and is therefore admissible.2. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:43 am by INFORRM
Permission to appeal had been refused on paper by Sir Richard Buxton on 6 March 2012 but granted by Moore-Bick LJ at an oral hearing on 26 March 2012. [read post]
” He considered the principles established by the House of Lords in In re J [2005] and decided it was in Saleem’s best interest to return to Morocco. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 1:00 am by Diane Tweedlie
In response to this communication, the appellant re-emphasised his modest financial resources and pointed out that the Japan Patent Office had already granted a patent on the basis of a corresponding patent application. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hold a special sitting March 30, 2015, at the Edward J. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:08 am by war
Interestingly, Logan J has granted a stay of his order to remove all references to A.S.P. from IHC UK’s Web site at www.affinage.com. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The following passage deals with the allowability of the request:*** Translated from the German ***[3.2.1] According to the established case law of the Boards of appeal, a request for re-establishment can only be granted if the party filing the request under A 122 has taken all due care required by the circumstances and nevertheless could not observe a time limit. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
As an auxiliary request, it requestd that the following question be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA): “In which way should the term “pending” in R 25(1) EPC 1973 (now R 36(1) EPC) be interpreted for the case where the parent application has been deemed to be withdrawn but a request for re-establishment of rights was filed and a relevant appeal was pending at the time of filing of the divisional application? [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:30 pm by Ronald Meisburg
It came as no surprise to most labor practitioners this week that the Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the U.S Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s decision in NLRB v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:42 pm by Julie Lam
The Michigan Supreme Court directed the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application for leave to appeal or take other action in In re J L Gordon, Minor, No. 143673. [read post]