Search for: "In Re: M., Mark, III"
Results 21 - 40
of 403
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
” [I’m not sure how we should think about Article III standing for purposes of injunctive relief—it seems clear there’s standing to contest the registration, but is there sufficient injury/redressability for an injunction if there’s no pending use in the US?] [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 7:39 am
The post Students for Fair Admissions and the End of Racial Classification as We Know It (Re-Post) appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:37 am
John's) points me to a recent Delaware decision, In re Emerson Radio Shareholder Deriv. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am
I’m attracted to substance: create a real divide between registered and unregistered marks, perhaps by double identity for registered marks and a robust harm requirement for unregistered marks. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 6:35 am
Anyway, the trademark infringement claim wasn’t plausibly pleaded, because Jones didn’t have statutory standing (an argument the court raised on its own motion, which I’m not sure is right for non-Article III standing but ok). [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
FIDELITY was also descriptive of fidelity insurance, meaning the registrations for the same should be amended down to “insurance services except fidelity insurance” (I think this is sensible enough but I’m not as sure as the judge that POSTKANTOOR permits this sort of carve out. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:24 am
Or Mark. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:09 pm
" To Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman financial services partner Joseph Lynyak III, the biggest question mark a year ago was "whether the CFPB would act more as an enforcer or a regulator. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 5:16 am
After a week of packing and (partial) unpacking, finding my lost keyboard, and fiddling unsuccessfully with my wireless network, I'm glad to see this quarter draw to a close. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
I’m pretty sure I’ve owned several such pans, but I’m not sure I knew they were unique to Tefal. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:00 am
Comments from Erik M. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
I’m am [sic ] potentially losing money anytime I send one of my clients to the HER web site because my clients can’t search the entire MLS. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 10:14 am
That, by the way, was the one exclamation mark I'm alotted in this post. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 4:44 pm
Domain Names and Trade Marks: an Uncomfortable Inter-relationship. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm
Enforcement lacks transparency re: nature/volume of sanctions. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:18 pm
If the attorneys who think they're worth $2900/hour are missing this basic issue-spotting that I caught, maybe I'm worth $3000/hour and even more underpaid than I thought. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm
See In re Old Glory Condom Corp., 26 USPQ 2d 1216, 1220, n. 3 (TTAB 1993) (‘[I]ssuance of a trademark registration . . . is not a government imprimatur’). [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
The “M” stands for “magnetic,” and those devices certainly are. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
