Search for: "In Re: M.R." Results 21 - 40 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In In re M.R., 858 S.W.2d 365, 366 (Tex. 1993) (per curiam opinion denying application for writ of error), we stated that, unlike the rule in criminal cases, in juvenile proceedings a motion for new trial is necessary to preserve a factual sufficiency challenge.2 Unlike in In re M.R., however, R.D. did file a motion for new trial. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 9:19 am by Eric P. Robinson
See In re: Extended Media Coverage in the Circuit Courts of Illinois on an Experimental Basis, M.R. 2364 (Ill. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:12 am by Eugene Volokh
The judge also allowed the policeman to litigate the case pseudonymously (under the pseudonym M.R.), and allowed one of M.R.'s affidavits to be redacted. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:19 am by PaulKostro
A competent patient is able to choose his course of treatment even if his medical decision may seem irrational or unsupported by medical evidence. [1] In re M.R., 135 N.J. 155, 167 (1994). [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 9:00 am
 The presumption is consistent with the golden rule, which was described by Lord Esher M.R. in Re Harrison (1885) 30 Ch. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:42 pm by law shucks
M.R.23720 – In re: Loren Elliotte Friedman. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:20 pm by Rumpole
"The fact that M.R. was known to one of the officers as having been involved in prostitution on a previous occasion does not affect the issue of whether her conduct at the time of the arrest justified the stop. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
  This is despite the ‘golden rule’ that the courts do not favour an intestacy: see Lord Esher M.R. in Re Harrison (1885), 30 Ch.D 390. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 4:35 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
M.R. 24075 (Nov. 12, 2010)(attorney engaged in a dishonest conversion when he cashed an escrow check and used the funds for his own purposes). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:13 am by PaulKostro
These two roles became distinct and separate after the revision of R. 4:86-4 which was the result of the Court’s ruling in In re M.R., 135 N.J. 155 (1994). [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:33 am by admin@lawiscoool.com (Omar Ha-Redeye)
Torstar Corp we’re likely to to see the courts enter this foray as well. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
Richard Re covered the decision for this blog, with other coverage coming from Tony Mauro of the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required) and Steven Wildberger of JURIST. [read post]