Search for: "In Re: Mark Green v."
Results 21 - 40
of 657
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
They’re Now Facing a Possible Collapse. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 1:06 am
Therefore, laws vary state by state.The legal differences between the U.S. states became evident in a lawsuit from 2011 between a celebrity photographer and Marilyn Monroe’s estate (Greene Archives v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:47 am
[1] Garcoa, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
This year marks the 10th anniversary of President Xi Jinping’s proposal on building a community with a shared future for mankind. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:20 am
This last comment reflects that of Wood Ch. in Re St Mark Haydock [2023] ECC Liv 2 that the chosen system, “whilst not perfect in terms of carbon emission, was nevertheless a significant stride forward compared to the current system”. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 12:08 am
At the present time, only four judgments have been handed down following the revision of the Faculty Jurisdiction Rules in relation to net zero issues, and two most recent – Re St Mark Haydock [2023] ECC Liv 2 and Re All Saints Scotby [2023] ECC Car 2 provide examples of how DACs and petitioners operate within the new provisions. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 7:42 am
00:57:46 Michelle Spencer: We keep down-sizing our tech and now we’re supposed to start up-sizing? [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:54 am
As featured in #WorkforceWednesday: This week, we’re recapping the last year of the Dobbs decision: June 24, 2023, marks exactly one year since the widely controversial Dobbs v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Perhaps we have reached the stage of dealing with scientific evidence at which errant and aberrant cases should be retracted, and clearly marked as retracted in the official reporters, and in the electronic legal databases. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
Swift J found that a new appeal would simple re-run arguments which had already been made. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:07 am
The reason there will be no more than 58 opinions in argued cases is because one of those cases (In re Grand Jury) was DIGed (dismissed as improvidently granted), and SEC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
And if you don’t know the topic well, you’re grateful to Mark for explaining it to you. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:52 am
April 27, 2023 - 12 PM [Virtual]: Campari America LLC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:09 am
March 27, 2023 - 11 AM [In-person]: In re Lindsay Hoopes, Serial Nos. 90498749 and 90498755 [Section 2(d) refusals to register NAPANAC for "Brandy; Fortified wines; Spirits" in view of the registered certification mark NAPA GREEN for wine derived from grapes grown in Napa Valley, California, and for promoting sustainable winery practices in Napa Valley, and in view of the registered mark NAPA VALLEY for wine.] [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm
Cariou v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:00 am
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, 138 S. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
I know an ash standing Yggdrasil hight, a lofty tree, laved with limpid water: thence come the dews into the dales that fall; ever stands it green over Urd's fountain. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Thus, a low volume of goods marketed under that trade mark may be compensated for by high intensity of use or a certain constancy regarding the time of use of that trade mark or vice versa (08/07/2004, T 334/01, Hipoviton, EU:T:2004:223, § 36).Therefore, the Cancellation Division of the EUIPO acknowledged the valid goods that were of sufficient evidence regarding the genuine uses (marked in bold green) while revoking the rest due to insufficient… [read post]
