Search for: "In Re: Mortgage Foreclosure v." Results 21 - 40 of 409
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2010, 6:34 am by David Zaring
  And to suggest otherwise, as the COP does, seems to me to be a basic error in the application of the state action doctrine, unless they're arguing that banks are now state actors, via TARP (no way), or that, because of Shelley v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:41 am by MBettman
”) In Re Dorsey, 13, 8036 (B.A.P. 6th Cir. 2014) (Evaluating Kentucky law, holding that “a mortgage is valid and enforceable only if the underlying debt continues to be an enforceable obligation. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:14 am
Goldman Sachs has also been ordered not to re-enter the mortgage serving industry while the review is taking place. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:58 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Our preview of the September term of the Illinois Supreme Court continues with EMC Mortgage Corp. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:19 am by Michael Froomkin
Accordingly, upon issuance of this administrative order, the statewide managed mediation program is terminated.” Here’s the full text of the order: IN RE: MANAGED MEDIATION PROGRAM FOR RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES A statewide managed mediation program for residential mortgage foreclosure cases was established in 2009 by In re: Final Report and Recommendations on Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Cases,… [read post]