Search for: "In Re: Order Amending Internal Operating Procedure Section 7.A of the Internal Operating Procedures of the Supreme Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
(Amended Opinion) U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, May 08, 2008 US v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:14 pm
In Chadha, the Supreme Court invalidated a radical departure from the Article I, Section 7 procedure whereby a single congressional chamber could veto the President’s legal action, thereby inverting the constitutional order of events. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
The procedures for review of the detainees' status provided by the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 are not an adequate and effective substitute for habeas corpus, and consequently, section 7 of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA), operates as an unconstitutional suspension of the writ. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
For this post we consider the first part of section III of the materials: III.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
You’re reading a Supreme Court blog. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 3:19 am
” Wise words from someone who should know — Nassau County Supreme Court Justice Timothy S. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
See also In re Bextra & Celebrex Marketing Sales Practices & Product Liability Litigation, 2006 WL 2374742, at *7 (C.D. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
Three issues (at least) arise from the intention to add sections 90Q.1 and 90Q.2 to Part V of the CA, 1867: which part of the constitutional amending procedure applies? [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Supreme Court, May 19, 2008 US v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Webb, No. 06-5806 An order denying a 28 U.S.C. section 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus from a conviction for assault is affirmed over claims that judicial bias, ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and his invalid plea of guilty warranted reversal of the district court's decision. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
County of Allegheny, No. 06-2869 "In an action against various defendants for violations of 42 U.S.C. section 1983 and state law, arising from a former 911 dispatcher's improper use of his job facilities to track down and kill his ex-girlfriend and her boyfriend, plaintiff's son, dismissal of the claims is reversed in part and the matter remanded with instructions to permit plaintiff an opportunity to amend certain state-created danger and equal protection claims, as… [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
The course has also expanded from its original narrow and technical focus, to a broader focus on principles and the use of language and logic to build and operate a system of law. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Supreme Court The U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
The Court focuses on the “subject of the operative sentence” in Section 3.1, of whic [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
[7] This anomaly has led the Supreme Court to observe that, in exemption 5 cases, privileges recognized in civil litigation must be applied merely as “rough analogies. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
It would repeal section 512(m) and effectively impose a 24-7-365 monitoring obligation on all OSPs, no matter their size or available resources. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Both understand that, whatever the response, these questions will be determined by lawyers, scholars, and arbitrators operating within the system of international investment law and not by actors operating outside of it. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
Which court hears the removal case and under what procedures? [read post]
