Search for: "In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation"
Results 21 - 40
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2022, 10:35 pm
One might even say that the only thing consistent about Apple's tactics is that they're constantly being inconsistent. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:26 pm
"That was in-camera review by the court, and the re-review that Google has been asked to perform now will simply be done by Google itself. [read post]
12 May 2022, 1:37 am
With Apple's annual litigation budget in the billions of dollars, that may be workable. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 3:22 am
Qualcomm hearing two years ago that the house of cards (based on which Qualcomm was held liable for antitrust violations, and enjoined) began to fall. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 6:51 am
You're licensed, or you're not licensed. [read post]
8 Jan 2022, 1:27 am
Then, they also brought an "antitrust case" against licensing firm IPCom that is probably the greatest lunacy I've ever seen in patent litigation and was exposed as totally meritless by the Mannheim Regional Court. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
If you're a Qualcomm or an Ericsson, why would you not want to get paid if Nokia does? [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 8:38 pm
By contrast, antitrust issues had actually been raised by Deutsche Telekom in its multi-year litigation with IPCom, but when Deutsche Telekom--not under duress but purely for the convenience of its then-outgoing CEO--wanted to settle, IPCom negotiated a Section 8.2 of the 2013 agreement that Presiding Judge Dr. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am
”4 In fact, Judge Koh observed that “Qualcomm had received licenses ‘to manufacture and sell components,’” “Qualcomm received ‘exhaustive licenses’ from ‘[o]ver 120 companies,’” and “Qualcomm has emphasized in prior litigation that a SEP holder may not discriminate in licensing its SEPs. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 7:29 am
They're also clearly against U.S. case law. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:19 am
Antitrust law can do that.The FTC's motion for rehearing en banc against the Qualcomm panel decision failed. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am
After this post, I'll (have to) take a break from blogging about App Store antitrust matters for a few weeks or maybe even months, as I'll explain further below. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 11:47 am
I'm not worried about Qualcomm or other major SEP holders laying off talented engineers anytime soon.Bird & Bird partner Richard Vary, formerly Nokia's litigation chief and now its outside counsel in connection with automotive SEP licensing matters, equated the concept of patent exhaustion with a "windfall" for downstream members of a supply chain. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 8:51 am
Automotive supplier Continental brought FRAND litigation against the Avanci pool and several of its contributors, particularly Nokia, in 2019. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 11:41 pm
Presumably they're going to launch a massive legislative assault on Alice (§ 101) with lots of support on both sides of the aisle. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 6:35 am
In the meantime, Apple had already come under pressure to re-incorporate Qualcomm chips into the iPhone models in question. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 9:46 am
Qualcomm Inc. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 12:30 am
Grosch), was highly persuasive, even though I've more frequently seen him argue just the other way on behalf of plaintiffs like Qualcomm. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 1:47 am
In alphabetical order:Avanci: Sharp, just like Nokia, Ericsson, Qualcomm and many others, is a member of the abusive Avanci gang. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 12:37 am
Even in Friday's motion, Epic makes an unequivocal admission:"Epic does not prevail on its antitrust claims, then Epic would be liable for breach. [read post]
