Search for: "In Re: R.C. F." Results 21 - 40 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
ODNR regulatory news:NOTICE TO WELL OWNERS re: tubular goods (3/31/2015)—The requirements of R.C. 1509.16 became effective March 31, 2015. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:38 am by MBettman
Justice Kennedy joined Justice O’Donnell’s dissent which would find that imposing a mandatory sentence under R.C. 2929.13(F) based on a prior nonjury juvenile adjudication does not violate due process or run afoul of Apprendi v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm by MBettman
 Three immigration concepts are mentioned in R.C. 2943.031:  “naturalization,” “exclusion from admission” (now called “admissibility” or “admission”), and deportation (now called removal). [read post]
31 May 2006, 6:06 am by Koz
MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONSIn re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes Cases, 2006-Ohio-2626.Dispositions of currently pending appeals based on the decision in State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:55 am by MBettman
Co., 561 F.3d 439, 443 (6th Cir.2009) (It is impermissible to consider each and every exposure to asbestos to be a substantial factor causing the disease. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
IN RE COLEY Petitioner was convicted of failing to update his sex offender registration within five working days of his birthday (former Pen. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
SMITH Defendant-appellant Allen Smith appeals from his conviction after the trial court found him guilty of failure to verify his current residence, in violation of R.C. 2950.06(F). [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am by MBettman
On September 28, 2012, the trial court sentenced Blankenship to five years of community control and classified him as a Tier II Sex Offender pursuant to R.C. 2950.01(F)(1)(b). [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am by MBettman
Further, in R.C. 2929.03(F), the trial judge must articulate his or her factual findings by issuing a written opinion outlining the independent re-weighing of the relevant factors. [read post]