Search for: "In Re: Schering Plough Corp."
Results 21 - 40
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm
Moreover, given the Third Circuit’s intervening standing decision in In re Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
" In re Schering Plough, 2012 U.S. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:14 pm
See In Re: Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
16 May 2012, 1:23 pm
May 16, 2012), and In Re: Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:56 am
Oct. 7, 2009) (“[m]erely alleging that [defendant] marketed the drugs at issue for off-label purposes does not state a claim for fraud”); In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am
Schering-Plough Corp., 842 A.2d 174, 177-78 (N.J. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm
Geneva Pharms., Inc., 344 F.3d 1294 (11th Cir. 2003) and Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Schering Corp., 606 A.2d 1140, 1148, 1150 (N.J. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:33 am
This too is not new ground, see In re Schering-Plough Corp., Intron/Temodar Consumer Class Action, 2009 WL 2043604 (D.N.J. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:08 am
Schering-Plough Corp., No. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:08 am
Schering-Plough Corp., No. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 4:56 am
Schering-Plough Corp., 367 N.J. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit upheld in Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 12:20 pm
This case is an antitrust challenge to an agreement settling patent litigation between defendant-appellee Schering-Plough Corp.2 ("Schering") and defendant-appellee Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 10:42 am
Cir. 2001), and applied by the FTC in an administrative proceeding – In re Schering-Plough Corp., F.T.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:50 pm
In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:28 am
In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:30 pm
The Sixth Circuit considers such agreements per se illegal, see In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litig., 332 F.3d 896 (6th Cir. 2003), the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice both consider them presumptively anticompetitive, see In re Schering Plough Corp., No. 9297 (F.T.C. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:46 pm
” In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:52 pm
In 2005, in Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]