Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions In Criminal Cases (No. 2005-7)"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
Alas, if you’re a criminal defense lawyer or a civil rights lawyer, then you instinctively rolled your eyes the moment you read the phrase “changed their policy. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm
I am not satisfied that there is sufficient evidence before me at this stage to conclude that, a properly instructed jury in Hamilton, will deliver anything but a true verdict in this case [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
Who do you think the jury is most likely to follow? [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
The defendant died during the pendency of the case, however, and the district court declined to instruct the jury on punitive damages against his estate. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
A relator cannot merely allege that a defendant violated a standard (in this case, with respect to radiology studies), but must allege that compliance with the standard was required to obtain payment. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
The extracts from this exhaustive judgment are reproduced hereunder;7. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
Dow Agrosciences LLC, 544 U.S. 431 (2005), a non-FDCA case involving violation claims under a different statute. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:15 pm
Crawford activated his overhead lights and instructed defendant to pull over to [**4] the right-hand side. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
The case against ‘99¢ Only Stores’ concerned the sale of three cleaning and pest control products. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
Simple assault is a disorderly persons offense unless committed in a fight or scuffle entered into by mutual consent, in which case it is a petty disorderly persons offense. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
In re: Jeffrey Beard, et.al. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:53 pm
S. 408, 418 (2005)). [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:22 am
In the opinion, 1st Circuit Judge Michael Boudin noted that the district court's instructions and the jury verdict were in line with 1st Circuit precedent, which interprets the term "cocaine base" in the statute to include "all forms of cocaine base, including but not limited to crack cocaine. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
The six other companies pleaded guilty in criminal cases. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
DHS checks biometric data on those applying for admission to the United States against government databases to identify suspected terrorists, known criminals, or individuals who have previously violated U.S. immigration laws. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Fagans, 406 F.3d 138 (2d Cir. 2005). [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Kuehne, No. 06-3668 A conviction for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) allegedly improper venue; 2) the definition of "use" under 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1); 3) jury instruction regarding proof necessary for conviction under section 924(c); 4) constructive amendment or variance of the indictment; 5) prosecutorial misconduct; 6) a motion for acquittal; 7) alleged inaccuracies in the transcript of proceedings; 8)… [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
L. 6, 7 (1784); Coryell v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
The procedures for review of the detainees' status provided by the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 are not an adequate and effective substitute for habeas corpus, and consequently, section 7 of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA), operates as an unconstitutional suspension of the writ. [read post]
