Search for: "In Re: Watkins v." Results 21 - 40 of 176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
On 30 March 2022 there was an application in the case of Watkins -v- Mackle. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:02 am by Josh Blackman
" Watkins, 354 U.S. at 200; see also Eastland, 421 U.S. at 508 ("[I]n deter [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 23 June 2021 in the case of Abbasi v Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals [2021] EWHC 1699 (Fam) McFarlane P held there was jurisdiction to maintain or re-impose a reporting restriction order protecting the anonymity of clinicians and other treating staff involved in the care of a child, now deceased, who had been the subject of end of life proceedings under the inherent jurisdiction, where the order was to remain in force for a significant period following… [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
v=SsvnVoEqHAk For the 2020 MLB season, it was strange from beginning to end. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:08 am by CMS
However, those exceptions were not applicable to Mr Watkins’ claim and they remitted the claim back to the County Court for a re-hearing (postponed pending the appeal to the Supreme Court). [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Edwards on behalf of the estate of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors was heard on 25th July. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
McNeily, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Thursday, July 11, 2019 Tags: Fiduciary duties, Investment Advisers Act, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, U.S. federal courts [read post]