Search for: "In Re: Whitaker v."
Results 21 - 40
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2013, 10:26 am
CeridianFirst Circuit Rejects Data Insecurity Claims on the Basis of Article III Standing--Katz v PershingNew Essay: The Irony of Privacy Class Action LawsuitsAnother Data Loss Case Tossed on Article III Grounds--Whitaker v. [read post]
LXBN This Week Ep. 3: Facebook’s IPO, Oracle v. Google, POM’s “Juice Wars” and U.S. v. Roger Clemens
29 May 2012, 4:26 pm
POM Wonderful v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm
Hobia (restricted Indian allotment, casino construction)In re Whitaker (bankruptcy)Klamath Tribe Claims Committee v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:33 am
For a similar example of a Northern District of California judge rejecting such tendentious cutting-and-pasting, see Judge Fogel’s opinion in Woods v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:35 pm
CeridianFirst Circuit Rejects Data Insecurity Claims on the Basis of Article III Standing--Katz v PershingNew Essay: The Irony of Privacy Class Action LawsuitsAnother Data Loss Case Tossed on Article III Grounds--Whitaker v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:51 am
Original Article On September 15, 2010, the Southern Center for Human Rights filed a renewed motion for summary judgment in Whitaker v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 11:56 am
Purchasing PowerSony Network Data Breach Class Action Suffers Setback -- In re Sony Gaming Network Starbucks Data Breach Plaintiffs Rebuffed by Ninth Circuit -- Krottner v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 11:54 am
Ceridian First Circuit Rejects Data Insecurity Claims on the Basis of Article III Standing--Katz v Pershing New Essay: The Irony of Privacy Class Action Lawsuits Another Data Loss Case Tossed on Article III Grounds--Whitaker v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm
In Whitaker v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 10:14 am
Ceridian First Circuit Rejects Data Insecurity Claims on the Basis of Article III Standing–Katz v Pershing New Essay: The Irony of Privacy Class Action Lawsuits Another Data Loss Case Tossed on Article III Grounds–Whitaker v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 7:41 am
In re Whitaker, 115 S.Ct. 2 (1994). [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:49 am
” Whitaker v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 1:15 pm
Srinivasan asks: Are you saying that, if Congress re-enacted the Ethics in Government Act, the statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 4:12 am
Hess v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 5:30 pm
In the case of Johns v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:01 pm
For the last two years, SCHR has represented a class of people on the registry in Whitaker v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Hall v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:17 am
’ Whitaker v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 12:44 pm
Warwick, Paul & Warwick v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm
Whitaker (D.D.C. filed Jan. 15, 2019) argues that this violates the First Amendment. [read post]
