Search for: "In Re: White v." Results 21 - 40 of 3,989
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2012, 10:44 am
  And imagine being the (third) lawyer appointed to represent White at his trial. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Knowsley HT v White, Honeyghan-Green v LB Islington & Porter v Shepherds Bush Housing Association [2008] UKHL 70 -   for anyone who hasn’t read it yet. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
§ 2000e et seq., by allowing NYCHA to pay them less than similarly situated white employees.The District Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ amended complaint under Rule 12[b][6], concluding that their claims were precluded by res judicata. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 11:06 am
The pre-motion conference in connection with defendant's contemplated motion to dismiss complaint in Warner v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:15 am by Burman York (Bud) Mathis III
Quinn evokes Lewis Carrol’s White Queen, “who was known to have sometimes ‘believed six impossible things before breakfast’” to describe the ridiculous nature of the Yu. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:15 am by Burman York (Bud) Mathis III
Quinn evokes Lewis Carrol’s White Queen, “who was known to have sometimes ‘believed six impossible things before breakfast’” to describe the ridiculous nature of the Yu. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
” [same, even assuming that Chaplinsky v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 3:44 pm by Steve Vladeck
 These Aren’t the [Rationales] You’re Looking For… First, the white paper is thoroughly disappointing. [read post]
30 May 2010, 10:58 pm
5-31-2010 Missouri:White -v- McKinley, District Court Western Missouri:Theodore White, Jr. brought this civil action following his prosecution, conviction, re-prosecution, and eventual acquittal for the alleged molestation of his adopted daughter. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 11:30 am
Especially when you're at a white shoe firm like Skadden Arps.So when Justice Willhite wrote last month that counsel for defendants -- Joren Bass, Richard Zuromski, and Raoul Kennedy -- repeatedly "misled" the Court of Appeal, including at oral argument, by stating a certain fact that wasn't true, you can understand why these attorneys might have been more than a little bit bummed. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 10:12 am by Erin Miller
Rodriguez: Disparities in school funding do not violate equal protection 6:57—Milliken v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 9:20 pm
")Anyway, not many White Hats worn these days where they're supposed to be.See You In Court. [read post]