Search for: "In Re Adoption of Children by F." Results 21 - 40 of 451
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2013, 8:16 am by resistance
The law has since changed obviating the necessity for a re-adoption proceeding. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 1:08 pm
On July 14, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in In re Lee, No. 137653. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Is there any reason to legalize it, beyond the collateral effects on children of criminalizing what their parents have done to bring them into the world? [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 1:15 pm by Stephen Bilkis
When asked to characterize the meeting, she concluded--'He persuaded me to give the baby up.' She returned to the attorney's office and from there to the court where she re-swore to Exhibit 8 (Affidavit of Natural Parent) and re-acknowledged Exhibit 7 (Agreement of Adoption and Irrevocable Consent) before the surrogate. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:32 pm by Jim Gerl
The high court clarified what FAPE means and how courts should apply the FAPE requirement.The decision in Endrew F by Joseph F v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:49 am by Eugene Volokh
And the court distinguished In re Adoption of Ridenour (Ohio 1991), which held that: … R.C. 3107.15 reflects the legislature's intent to find families for children. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  If a party wanted the court to adopt the exception, it appears that an argument similar to the one adopted in the California Court of Appeals case, In re Santos Y.[22] could be used. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:33 am by Christofer Bates
Relying on the First Circuit’s opinion in In re Kane, 254 F.3d 325, 331 (1st Cir. 2001), the court adopted factors to determine what constitutes extraordinary circumstances. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:37 am by PaulKostro
Under the Child Placement Act, “the Division is obliged, on its own and even in the absence of an application by a sibling, to insure and facilitate such visitation under N.J.S.A. 9:6B-4(f), up until the time that an adoption is finalized. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 1:35 pm by familoo
It's what underpins the Re B-S balancing document that we now routinely see in social workers' final statements. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:49 pm by Michel-Adrien
In the most recent issue, there are a number of items that caught my interest: 2014 Survey of Challenges to Resources and Policies in Canadian Libraries: "Nazi occultism in a graphic novel; a DVD laced with the 'F word'; a children's picture book rebuked for"promoting" a negative female body image; a series of graphic novels portraying violence and explicit sexuality; an adult novel deemed 'too explicit for a public library collection' and… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
Report: Family Law.Re F (Contact Application Via the Official Solicitor) [2012] EWCA (8 November 2012)Parents of 2 children classed as vulnerable. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:38 am by Richard Hunt
., 886 F.3d 674 (8th Cir. 2018) the Eighth Circuit adopted rules concerning standing that place common sense limits on the ability of serial plaintiffs to expand their lawsuits any time they are threatened with mootness. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 8:03 am by Sam Hasler
").We, like the Court of Appeals panels in R.D.S. and Friar, read the statute to say that this one group includes children born out of wedlock as well as children born or adopted during the marriage—as long as both parties are the natural parents (or adopted the child).[7]Okay, so children of the marriage means children where husband and wife are the parents. [read post]