Search for: "In Re Amendments to Florida Rules" Results 21 - 40 of 1,789
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2024, 5:55 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Although the ruling was unanimous, the Court divided over the scope of the decision: the majority concluded that the disqualification of candidates for federal office under Section 3 required the enactment of congressional legislation under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 In Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re: Limiting Government Interference with Abortion, (FL Sup. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Jordan Lassiter
The rule requires facilities subject to the rule to submit response plans in the event of worst-case discharges to the agency. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm by Ilya Somin
On the other hand, if Texas and Florida officials had merely sought to persuade Facebook and Twitter to host various types of right-wing speech voluntarily, there would be no violation of the First Amendment there either. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am by Don Chen
Furthermore, they argue that citizens and states have a First Amendment “right to receive information and ideas. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But you really should start now in the hope that we might be able to get rid of British rule, if we’re lucky, by, say, 1825, which is only fifty years from now”? [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
That will send the message to local leaders they're on notice. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Incumbent federal officeholders cannot receive compensation from campaign funds under the updated rule. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 2:29 pm by Stewart Baker
I take a stab at the riskiest of ventures – predicting the results in two Supreme Court cases about social media regulations adopted by Florida and Texas. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
”  Perhaps, then, those arguments will be re-consigned to the obscure corners of implausible scholarship from whence they came. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
Florida has no compelling interest in creating a per se rule that some speech, regardless of its context or the effect it has on the listener, is offensive and discriminatory. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Id., at 115a–124a, 125a–161a, 162a–183a.Under the terms of the opinion of the Colorado SupremeCourt, its ruling was automatically stayed pending thisCourt’s review. [read post]