Search for: "In Re Angel S. Et Al."
Results 21 - 40
of 203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
United States of America, et al. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
United States of America, et al. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
City of Los Angeles (2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 368. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 2:41 pm
This is a result of California being the world’s fifth largest economy, and the CCPA’s scope applying to California residents (regardless of where the business is located).[1] Since most businesses do business in California, it follows that they will have data on California residents and thus the CCPA arguably applies. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
The Mayor of Los Angeles recommends that residents to wear masks outside the home. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
The book Full Disclosure by Archon Fung et al lays out multitudinous challenges to properly designing transparency reports. 317(g) conflicts with much of the book’s guidance, especially the uncertainty about who will use the information and how they will use it. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm
Ledesma-Cadhit et al, the plaintiffs invoked the PHACA as a basis for suing a physician and pharmaceutical company in negligence, after their 5 year old daughter died, allegedly as a result of the administration of the H1N1 influenza vaccination during a pandemic health risk in 2009. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:54 am
E.g., Jennifer Urban et al, Notice and Takedown in Everyday Practice, Mar. 22, 2017, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:24 pm
Supreme Court case of Dukes et al v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:31 pm
Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters, et al., U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
HOAs and the FHA Lau et al v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:48 am
” At Balkinization, Marty Lederman explains why one of the court’s newest cases for OT 2018, In re Department of Commerce, et al., a dispute arising out of a challenge to the administration’s decision to add a question about citizenship to the 2020 census, is “a very strange, almost inexplicable, grant. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 9:14 am
Television et al., ultimately backed by Hollywood’s top brass in an amicus brief filed with the California Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 5:05 pm
See Bridewell-Sledge, et al. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 1:52 pm
Lindsay v. 1777 Westwood Limited Partnership, et al.,2018 WL 4006425 (C.D. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 1:19 pm
PART I-CURRENT NEWS: COPYRIGHT OVER LAWS, IT’S STILL AN ISSUE: CONSENT DECREES COMMENT PERIOD: EMPIRE LAWSUIT GETS REVIVED: Greatest Hits – Important Cases The Slants Kirtsaeng (I&II) Raging Bull Aereo Utah Joins the Case History The Supreme Court AMERICAN BROADCASTING COS., INC., ET AL. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Mendez et al. (161 F.2d 774, 9th Circuit), decided April 14, 1947. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 11:40 am
Additional Resources: Haitayan, et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc., March 14, 2018, U.S, District Court, Central District of California More Blog Entries: Board Vacates Franchise Labor Law Decision, March 4, 2018, Los Angeles Employment Lawyers Blog [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s order [the case is… [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 9:01 am
Mill Supply Co. et al, Feb. 26, 2018, Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division More Blog Entries: New Bill Introduced to Keep Asbestos Out of Children’s Makeup, Feb. 12, 2018, Boston Mesothelioma Lawyer Blog The post Appellate Court Re-Opens Asbestos Wrongful Death Lawsuit Against Fertilizer Manufacturer appeared first on Mesothelioma Lawyers Blog. [read post]
