Search for: "In Re Appeal No. 101, Term 1976" Results 21 - 28 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Typically we see minimalist/maximalist debate where maximalists appeal to Lockean desert/Hegelian personhood theories to justify expansion, and minimalists appeal to utilitarianism and counterproductive effects on innovation. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm by David Cheifetz
Kathy K (The), [1976] 2 S.C.R. 802; Housen v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
A map or true copy of a map depicting the location and boundaries of the area on or within 1,000 feet of any property used for school purposes which is owned by or leased to any elementary or secondary school or school board produced pursuant to section 1 of P.L.1987, c.101 (C.2C:35-7) may be used in a prosecution under subparagraph (a) of paragraph (3) of this section. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
EPA.[46] As the Supreme Court observed, “[e]xtraordinary grants of regulatory authority are rarely accomplished through ‘modest words,’ ‘vague terms,’ or ‘subtle device[s]’” and that Congress does not “typically use oblique or elliptical language to empower an agency to make a ‘radical or fundamental change’ to a statutory sche [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:08 am by V.D.RAO
Case Study: In a recent appeal decided by the Supreme Court on section 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956, the submissions of the prominent corporate lawyers in India are note-worthy to note. [read post]