Search for: "In Re Application for Interception of Wire Communications"
Results 21 - 40
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2013, 5:16 am
This means that the Government's application cannot satisfy the territorial limits of Rule 41(b)(1).In re Warrant, supra. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
Apple’s recent acquiescence to the Chinese government, both by removing anti-censorship VPN applications and in Tim Cook’s recent speech in China, is not just disturbing because it shows Apple succumbing to Chinese pressure to remove counter-censorship applications and Skype from the Chinese App Store. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 10:24 am
The wrangling around the Communications Assistance to Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) is one of those issues that creeps inexorably forward and is hard to follow unless you're really focusing. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 10:29 am
The heart of this decision lies with the Massachusetts Wiretap Statute, which was designed to prevent the secret interception of oral and wire communications. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:50 pm
”[4] The first tip-off is in the official name Congress gave to this part of ECPA--STORED WIRE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSACTIONAL RECORDS ACCESS. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 11:12 am
That, of course, changed with electronic communications; you can capture them while they’re being transmitted or while they’re in storage (which we’ll get to in a minute). [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:26 am
§ 2518(8)(b); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 841 F.2d 1048, 1053 n.9 (11th Cir. 1988) (“applications” in the statute includes affidavits and related documentation). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 9:41 am
In 1986, the Wiretap Act was amended by The Electronic Communications Privacy Act to extend coverage of the Wiretap Act to electronic communications.Generally, the Wiretap Act as amended prohibits the intentional interception, use, or disclosure of wire and electronic communications, unless a statutory exception applies. [read post]
30 May 2011, 2:55 pm
In FY 2010, El Salvador passed wire intercept legislation and is in the process of establishing the wire intercept program. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:21 am
Section 934.03 makes it unlawful to intercept the contents of any “wire, oral, or electronic communication” unless the interception is carried out in accordance with other provisions of Florida law, which would have required an order issued by a judge that authorized the interception. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 2:15 am
The federal Wiretap Act generally prohibits the intentional interception of any wire, oral, or electronic communication so it would apply to any audio surveillance but not to video surveillance. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 1:57 pm
CALEA was meant "to preserve the Government's ability . . . to intercept communications involving advanced technologies such as digital or wireless transmission modes, or features and services such as call forwarding, speed dialing and conference calling, while protecting the privacy of communications". [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 1:35 pm
He didn’t allege that communications were intercepted legally. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:07 am
The warrant applications have a heavy burden to meet. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
any wire, oral, or electronic communication. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:22 am
ECPA: The ECPA claim focused on whether there was an interception of a wire or electronic communication. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 10:53 am
In effect, the ECPA prohibits the intentional actual or attempted interception, use, disclosure or “procure[ment] [of] any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept any wire, oral, or electronic communication. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:06 pm
Clemens' lawyers did not invoke the Hyde Amendment, as the government's response points out, and could not do so in any event since he faces re-trial and has not yet prevailed. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:09 pm
A separate subsection (2511(2)(g)(ii)) also provided an exemption that was applicable to the interception of "radio communications," but this subsection contained a laundry list of the types of "radio communications" which were exempt (none of which were readily applicable in this case). [read post]
