Search for: "In Re Application of Smith"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2020, 4:05 am
" In re Steelbuilding, 75 USPQ2d at 1424.Applicant's evidence on this issue was "substantively sparse. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 10:54 am
In re Smith (Fed. [read post]
19 May 2022, 3:21 am
" In re Smith & Loveless, Inc., Serial No. 88497482 (May 16, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin). [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 5:13 pm
In re Binney & Smith Inc., Serial No. 78472642 (December 18, 2006) [not citable].Applicant Binney & Smith lamely argued that Registrant's mark is "inherently weak" in light of the descriptive meaning of "color," pointing to its own disclaimer and to a list of third-party registrations. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
§102(a)(2) which relates to conflicts between inventions in different applications. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:06 am
I'll also comment on next Monday's second case management conference, and I'll be speaking about the application of competition law to SEPs at a London conference on Tuesday that is keynoted by Mr Justice Smith and organized by Concurrences together with King's College London. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Beck of the Philadelphia office of the Reid Smith law firm for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
Smith. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
In December 2009, the CA rejected this application for a stay. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
Hayward then made an application to strike out the claim on the grounds of res judicata (ie, that the new claim raised an issue which had already been adjudicated upon) and on the grounds that the claim was an abuse of process. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 12:36 pm
via www.washingtonpost.com Maybe I should change my name from Smith to Stein. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 4:40 am
Applications are due by October 8, 2021. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
However, due to Reed Smith’s Pelvic Mesh representations, we’re constrained in what we can say. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
On 8 March 2019, interim judgment was handed down in the apparently unremarkable case of Justyna Zeromska-Smith v United Lincolnshire Hospital Trust [2019] EWHC 552(QB). [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 10:45 am
In re Smith, Ch. 11 Case No. 08-63990 (click here for Order). [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
McEwen* Introduction In the article included in the Stein McEwen Newsletter entitled Overview of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act: What Is The Practical Effect of First-to-File for Patent Applicants (October 2011), the novelty portions of the American Invents Act were explored. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 1:16 am
See Smith v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
SMITH AND BRUCE M. [read post]
25 May 2018, 5:00 am
For example, this means you will need to: Prepare the applicable official disclosure forms. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:01 pm
Justice Cohen, quoting from a Saskatchewan case, Re Smith Estate, 2003 SKQB 361, set out the order in which types of gifts abate as follows:First, residuary personalty;Second, residuary real property;Third, general legacies, which include pecuniary bequests from the residue;Fourth, demonstrative legacies, that is bequests from the proceeds of a specific asset or fund not forming part of the residue; [See Re Culbertson (1967), 62 D.L.R. (2d) 134 (Sask. [read post]
