Search for: "In Re Augenstein"
Results 21 - 27
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2024, 2:35 am
Patentees would be well advised to carefully consider the timing of their PI application alongside their chosen forum (including within the UPC), and in any event file a full application, early, as there is always the possibility of re-filing a further application if the PI trigger has not yet been met, rather than timing out due to lack of urgency. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:40 am
This can be done concurrently with re-sitting the failed papers M, but those papers will only be marked if the candidate passes paper F. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:43 am
In short, there’s nothing surprising here: we’re in line with European Union law. [read post]
12 May 2017, 12:45 pm
I am happy to announce the publication of an article, "Shaping a Global Law for Business Enterprises: Framing Principles and the Promise of a Comprehensive Treaty on Business and Human Rights," that appears in the North Carolina Journal of International Law 42(2): 417-504 (2016).The introduction follows; comments and engagement always welcome. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:19 am
Then the management thinks: we’re not going there because that’s already blocked. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:55 am
On December 12, 2023, the President of the BRPTO gave a normative and binding character to four Opinions of the Specialized Federal Attorney’s Office, imposing restrictions on the actions available to applicants when appealing first instance decisions. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 pm
(Pix from Business and Human Rights Resource Center, Binding treaty: Pros and cons (June 2014))As the Business and Human Rights Resource Center explained:At the 26th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, two resolutions were tabled for adoption by the Council. [read post]
