Search for: "In Re Best Products Co., Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 925
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 Imrex Co., Inc., 473 U.S. 479 (1985)  Abrahams v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am by Daniel J. Gilman
    In case you’re not yet sated, I thought I’d focus on one specific line of argument in the Google antitrust trial that echoes one in the FTC’s “dark patterns” consumer-protection case against Amazon. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am by admin
§ 455 – In re School Asbestos Litigation (1992),” 38 Villanova L. [read post]
The SEC may also conduct an “examination,” which involves a thorough review of a company’s disclosures, marketing materials, compliance plans, and internal controls to determine whether they are aligned with actual business practices.[9] The SEC similarly will “assess whether ESG products are appropriately labeled and whether recommendations of such products for retail investors are made in the investors’ best interests. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 10:43 am by Rob Robinson
It was founded in 2021 by Sergey Demyanov, Maksim Ivanov, and a third co-founder. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:49 pm by Keith Szeliga and Emily Theriault
Summer is here and we’re back with another edition of the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing requirements that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[2] The time is indeed ripe for us to re-examine how we assess bank mergers under the statutory framework that Congress has enacted. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Fundamental Law for Journalists Author: Mark Bourrie Publisher: Irwin Law Inc. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The best my research could uncover were: Matter of Taines v Gene Barry One Hour Photo Process, Inc., where the court refused to grant the purchasing shareholders lenient payment terms based on their oppressive conduct (123 Misc 2d 529, 539 [Sup Ct, NY County 1983]); Matter of Elniski v Niagara Falls Coach Lines, Inc., which allowed installment payments (101 AD3d 1722, 1722 [4th Dept 2012]); and In re Rapid Recovery Enterprises, Inc., which… [read post]