Search for: "In Re Blake V."
Results 21 - 40
of 301
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 5:35 am
English law has recognized certain instances—such as proprietary torts like trespass, breach of fiduciary duty, and “exceptional circumstances” like the infamous Blake v Attorney General case related to stripping the profits from a British-turned-Soviet spy’s autobiography—where compensation for loss may not be sufficient. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
By Alec Lesseliers Introduction The British Museum, the Metropolitan Museum of Art (MET), and the Germanisches Nationalmuseum are a few of the world’s most famous and largest history museums with objects in their collection from all over the world. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:01 am
” As summed up in the landmark Blake v Blake Agency case, in both types of proceedings fair value “should be determined on the basis of what a willing purchaser, in an arm’s length transaction, would offer for the corporation as an operating business, rather than as a business in the process of liquidation. [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:01 am
Stories on the 2021 State v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am
Not according to a recent decision from the California Appellate Courts, Crane v R. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 8:41 am
Blake v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 8:02 am
“We’re a court,” she said. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In re McDonald’s Corp. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In re McDonald’s Corp. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm
ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5 This was the seminal privacy case of the year, decided by the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Rev. 56, 63–66 (2015) (suggesting after King v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:52 am
On the other side are cases like Rumsfeld v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
The Dormant Commerce Clause balancing test (the Pike v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Olson, The Excuse Factory 220–21 (1997). [2] See Volokh, supra note *. [3] See, e.g., Michael Blake, The Discriminating Shopper, 43 San Diego L. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Olson, The Excuse Factory 220–21 (1997). [2] See Volokh, supra note *. [3] See, e.g., Michael Blake, The Discriminating Shopper, 43 San Diego L. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
In 1901, in Downes v. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am
Quick links Lucinda Chaplin and William Carter, Lexology: Gender Identity v Gender Beliefs. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Each may be re-elected indefinitely. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
One topical example: the leaked draft Supreme Court opinionpurporting to overrule Roe v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 10:39 am
Sedlik v. [read post]
